Everywhere people talk is a battleground, called "civil, reasoned debate." One of the rules of that battleground is that when someone pokes a hole in the evidence you've used to draw your audience toward a conclusion, you can't put new evidence in its place to support the same argument; you have to make an entirely new argument, because the new evidence might lead you somewhere entirely else when looked at on its own.

Your point was

> NOTHING about Apple's 'curated, controlled' approach [that of having a closed source operating system] protects users

Definitely shifted goal posts.

Unrelated: you've said nothing to support this point anywhere throughout this thread.