Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by InclinedPlane | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

InclinedPlane

A tablet that could run x86 applications as needed but wasn't optimized for them.

View on HN

Why not just run a VM, and use the saved die area for more cache?

'cause cross-platform VM means emulation, and emulation is as a rule 10x slowdown at best?

JIT at installation time?

Would that be platform independent ?

Of course not, the translation engine needs to know how to properly map the op-codes between architectures.

That's not emulation that's decompilation / recompilation. Which is a very challenging task. TransMeta worked on this under the name of "code morphing". It's a promising technique but I don't think it has the maturity to be able to run cross-architecture code at close to hardware speeds (say, 50% or higher) without introducing new defects, especially x86 on ARM.

What you are discussing about, is a runtime issue.

I was discussing about installation time, which only prevents situations were you make use of code rewriting tricks, which are anyway frowned upon in the day and age of read-only code sections and no-execute data sections.

(Worth mentioning that the fancy new Mill processor takes this approach. It is technically viable, as Transmeta have already proved.)

Thanks for the heads up.

Putting a link here for those that want to follow up.

http://staff.science.uva.nl/~poss/posts/2013/08/01/mill-cpu/

Everyone's always had this idea, and it has very rarely proven to be terribly practical in reality. The few times that VMs of different hardware tend to be practical are when there is an enormous gap in performance between the emulated hardware and the host hardware (such as with old game consoles and arcade hardware).

Yeah, you're right. It would not match this use case.

I don't think it has been tried too many times in practice, because software binary translation is so proven (eg. like in android x86, or rosetta on mac, or fx!32 on nt, etc etc). Itanium is the only one that comes to mind. Any others?

Then there are several that have lower level "programmable microcode" kind of level in the hardware, ranging from the Transmeta stuff to mainframe-era writable control store...

Emulating a processor of another architecture will not be as quick as having the hardware, will it?

Indeed, I guess it depends whether your x86 application is going to be MS Word or some new game.

It would be cool if both the ARM and the x86 cores could use the same GPU.

exactly. this is actually where it could end up really useful for windows 8 even. run unmodified rt versions of software or the original x86. enabling it could be very interesting for the surface tablet. it would also be in theory doable for osx and ios that way.

why not just a x86 tablet?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com