I appreciate that porn (hard, soft or just this smut) is a business too, but is that the business that techcrunch is in?
For some only. That's the point.
Fuck cencorship. The freedom to offend is more important.
But I do know for a fact that some women, in fact some people do not find them funny. Which is what I did say.
Don't joke about anything that anybody could possibly get offended at?
Furthermore, even if you could prove that - percentage has nothing to do with it. That is a completely arbitrary qualifier. Offending people is a birth given right. Get over it.
What the fuck does that even mean?
> Given the response that occurred in the media and in general...
The media is your measuring stick? The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion? That's rich. You should probably go think about that some more.
You and all the whiners just like you are the ones complaining about tit jokes, so you prove it.
In my opinion? Citation needed.
> You and all the whiners just like you
Sweeping generalisation.
So to be clear, you're saying that there's no fuss being made, and also it's being made by "whiners"?
Why not just tell me the truth instead of asking me to cite you on your own opinion?
(I just can't imagine that you think "the media" is any better than this titstare app. Have you watched TV before?)
> Given the response that occurred in the media and in general...
So no, it's not a derailing tactic. And if you didn't notice, this thread is three pages to the right. There's nothing to derail.
When you're having a conversation in person, do you accuse them of being a Troll and derailing the conversation when they respond to your ridiculous assertions?
Give me a fucking break. This is like arguing with a three year old. OK fine, you can have the last word if it's so important to you. I've already torn apart every single point you think you've made, so fuck off.
Presenting it was not an act of discrimination or hate. It was inconsiderate and possibly both crude and dumb.
It's inconsiderate, because it could potentially make some members of the audience uncomfortable or self-aware. This would not be a concern if you knew the comportment of your audience. Snoop Dogg doesn't present himself or his content the same way on David Letterman that he does at a concert.
Someone being uncomfortable with your content doesn't invalidate it nor does your taking their discomfort into consideration in either content or presentation.
It shows that you are a mature human being with empathy.
Men are doing it anyway and there's nothing wrong with that either.
I think you will have to accept that many people hold a exactly opposite opinion on that point.
I think that we can agree that there are poorly formed opinions on display here.
> I say offend them even more until THEY accept that not everyone agrees with them.
Someone's throwing their toys around today.
> Someone's throwing their toys around today?
How so? By pointing out your illogical stance?
Hell no. This is standard derailing junk. It goes "my freedom to be an arsehole and drive people away is just as important as other people's desire to work in an arsehole-free environment." It's childish and inconsiderate.
> How so?
I leave it to you to work out what the petulant part of "I say offend them even more" is.
That's your fucking opinion though.
> I leave it to you to work out..blah blah blah.
Oh gawd. What a fucking cop-out. Stop replying to me you chicken shit.