Why everyone should learn to drive

The logic of this seems to be that driving has certain properties, these properties are worthwhile to experience and hence everybody has to learn how to drive.

What a silly idea.

While it is certainly true that driving might have these properties – I can’t really comment, as I don’t own a license, much less a car – but assuming that the only way to experience ‘accidents happen’ is by driving a car is rather strange. This especially holds since the idea that ‘accidents happen’ is a good experience is only remotely sensible because accidents not only happen in car traffic but basically everywhere else in life, too!

The same holds for the rest of the paragraphs: You have to plan irrespective of your mode of transportation (and of course outside of transportation, too), you have to replace the items in your possession after a certain time, be they socks, jeans, notebooks, washing machines or cars and of course you need safeguards outside a car, too.

To me, this article reads as if the author was unsatisfied with the original assessment that a car provides independence (which, of course, is not true: a car actually decreases your independence as you always have to return to it after a hike, for example) and tried to prop it up with equally unsatisfying extras.