Snowden, NSA, and counterintelligence | Hacker News Reader

Snowden, NSA, and counterintelligence

20committee.com

20 pointsrtpg6 comments

This comes across as a lot of nonsense. There is little here to support the rather outrageous claims. The whole "Ed" thing is typical of folks of a certain political bent who think diminishing a person through disrespectul over-familiarity helps their argument (think folks who constantly throw "Barry" into discussions referencing the President).

If there were ANY evidence Snowden was a Russian agent the US authorities would be leading with that for the simple reason it would rapidly undermine any popular support for him.

That's the thing I've been wondering about--either Snowden was a full-blown spy with lots of outside help, or he hacked his data out of the NSA on his own, with no formal spy training (and it wasn't as easy as downloading some files, either), which is ridiculously embarrassing for the NSA. The fact that they haven't branded him as a foreign agent immediately is telling.

The author in this article seems like he's being deliberately obtuse--

"Putin today called Ed “a strange guy” – whose main purpose is causing pain and suffering to Washington, DC. Which, let it be said, he has done rather well, thanks to the propaganda offensive waged by Greenwald, Poitras, and their helpers in several countries, with Ed’s purloined information, and who have masked their radical activism under the (thin) guise of post-modern journalism."

Right, because there's nothing at all problematic with the programs that Snowden revealed, and anyone who has a major problem with them is clearly a 'radical activist.'

I think we've found a great example of the type of mindset that led to these programs being created in the first place.

Sysadmins have lots of access into systems. Governments routinely favor security theater over actual mechanisms to secure things. The US government has a strong cultural bias towards having outside contractors rather tha employees on the government payroll (partly due to the ideological bent of the major political parties and partly due to lobbying by contractors). These things make it more than plausible that contract sysadmins had far too highly elevated access into far too wide-ranging sets of systems. No spying needed.

While this post doesn't strike me as particularly credible, the ties between Wikileaks and the Kremlin bear some investigation. Assange chose to host a talk show on RT, which is a mouthpiece of the Kremlin. One wonders to what extent Assange, in his opposition to the United States, has allowed himself to be used by a regime that is considerably less progressive and democratic than the Obama administration.

I read it as an interesting mix of conspiracy theory and potential counter intelligence ties. It certainly raises a couple of questions that are worth exploring. It will be interesting to see how things play out.

Interesting reading this. Particularly the language used. Shame in a way, because if it wasn't written in they way it is, it would sound plausible.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com