Hacker News Reader

Comment by lisper | Hacker News Reader

Unfortunately, the fact that you have to go through such an elaborate procedure will deter many people from going open-source. Before secure boot, installing Linux was relatively straightforward, and that is one of the reasons for its success. Those days are drawing to a close.

View on HN

Why can't this procedure be standardized and made straightforward? It's hard now, but hopefully in the future it will just be a typical part of installing the operating system.

Because the procedure requires making changes to the BIOS, and that can't be automated, or even standardized because different manufacturer's BIOSes are different. Recall this passage from the post:

"Reboot the machine, and go into the BIOS. Usually this means pounding on the F2 key as the boot starts up, but all machines are different, so it might take some experimentation to determine which key your BIOS needs."

That will be a show-stopper for most people.

Really? I think that's a pretty normal part of choosing to boot from external media, which is a pretty normal part of choosing to install an aftermarket operating system.

You think that because you're a geek. Normal people, if they run Linux at all, install it by booting from a CD. And even that is too scary for most people.

That procedure was only needed in order to show how booting a non-signed kernel was made possible and later how that was turned off again.

The magic is in KeyTool and that doesn't require the user to alter the BIOS in any way. You boot from that USB drive (sb-usb.img linked in the article) by the usual methods of booting from an external drive. It will boot because its bootloader is the Linux Foundation one that was signed by MS. Then you launch keytool and change the key config.

At this point, your bios will boot a kernel you have signed.

The only BIOS intervention in the article was to first allow booting unsigned kernels (not needed with that sb-usb thing) and then to turn it off again. At least that was my impression.

Ah. Well, it's possible I misunderstood that. I hope you're right.

Ah, hold on.

Doesn't running keytool require you to turn off security in the bios first?

> its bootloader is the Linux Foundation one that was signed by MS.

sounds like abomination. Even in the early 1998 our web browser had 4 or 5 root certificates. Why only one in the case of secure boot?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com