Steve Ballmer email to Microsoft employees on Nokia acquisition
microsoft.com
microsoft.com
Note, as per a few people Microsoft trying to "build everything for everyone" might sound like "lack of focus" but this has worked for Microsoft and will work for them in the future.
In countries like mine(India), the common guy on the street buys things that are cheap and durable. Which is why Nokia phones were such a huge hit for more than a decade, anything Nokia launched would sell like hot cakes. You cold buy a mobile for ~2000 rupees which wouldn't die for years. My dad used his mobile for a decade, and then we had to buy a new one for him after it got wet in the rain. He insisted we buy him Nokia and Nokia only. That's the brand power Nokia holds in India.
You will see memes all over Facebook, depicting Nokia as Thor's hammer. That's what Nokia is known for- ruggedness, durability, quality and amazing value for money.
And now if they can really come up with something similar for tablets and smart phone for the common market it will be a huge success. Apple makes very delicate phones, which are also very expensive for consumers in developing countries. And now with Steve Jobs gone, within a few years it will be price wars all over again.
Though I appreciate what Apple has done on the usability end. I believe things like price, durability and ruggedness are a big part of good engineering. And this is where Nokia scores above Apple.
With the Windows mobile OS, Nokia can great traction in markets like India. Especially if they can keep the price in check.
I just hope Microsoft doesn't mess up with Nokia, the last thing I would hate to see is Nokia lose its hardware edge.
Back in the day I often used my Nokia 3210 to stir drinks and open bottles. It would take an incredible amount of beating and still just work.
I feel all the new smart phones out there are a bit weak on the ruggedness department. I recently lost a Nexus S (with a protective case!) to a drop of just a few feet. I was actually surprised that the phone wasn't able to take it.
If a touchscreen-based smartphone was truly rugged yet consumer-grade, it would really have my attention.
I've linked (months ago) Youtube videos of people trying to destroy a Lumia 920. One man used the screen to pound a nail into a piece of wood, tossed it across a parking lot, drove over it with his car, and only got it to break when he threw it screen-first into a concrete wall. It's still a smartphone with the downsides of a giant piece of glass, but it's got the benefit of a solid and shock-absorbing chunk of plastic surrounding it. You can't get it wet, but you don't have to worry about it falling.
The Nokias might be thicker and bulkier than an iPhone, but an iPhone needs a thick and heavy case. The Lumia doesn't.
1 - http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/09/micros...
If true it would seem the deal is worth quite a bit less than it appears.
"Clearly, greater success with phones will strengthen the overall opportunity for us and our partners to deliver on our strategy to create a family of devices and services for individuals and businesses that empower people around the globe at home, at work and on the go, for the activities they value most."
Corporate beige-speak at its worst. How can anybody be inspired by this?
It is literally that vague and useless.
There's also an aspect of being a "mandatory blurb" for "market analyst (drones)" because it hits the right keywords.
It still feels they don't have the slightest idea of what they're doing
Basically what is being said is, our strategy is everything everywhere Microsoft, and buying Nokia will help us achieve that goal.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/Press/2013/Jul13/07-11me...
If you cut out all the nonsense and try and make sense of that sentence, it boils down to that they want to offer everything, to everyone, everywhere.
A recipe for failure, if I have ever heard one.
In fact, Nokia Windows Phones are the
fastest-growing phones in the smartphone market.
It's easier to grow by 78% YoY when you started off as low as they did. They jumped from under 3mm devices in 3Q12 to just over 7mm in 2Q13 (slide 9).For comparison, in April 2013, Google was reporting 1.5 million Android devices activated every day. http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/16/eric-schmidt-google-now-a...
Granted they are a long way behind regardless.
Hmmm. How about patting yourself on the back...
So Microsoft's "strategy" is to build everything for everyone, everywhere, all the time. Hilarious. This sounds less like a strategy, and more like a sentence concocted to justify an inability to focus.
While people were slagging them off, they got their shit together.
The strategy is simply: everything because they are big enough to do it.
Mobile situation is great. They are growing and now they have control over Nokia, they can do an Xbox i.e. make it succeed even if it's a loss leader for a bit. Not only that they still have piles of WinCE industrial devices going out of the door.
Not done much on the web. Are you blind? Office 365, SharePoint, Azure, Skype, Bing (which isn't as shit as people like to say) at least 3 complete web stacks, the most complete API implementation across all products, devdiv. They do everything Google does already apart from social which they leave to Facebook as after all they threw some cash in that direction. Oh and they do all that on the desktop AS WELL.
Nobody using their cloud - yeah right: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-29/microsoft-azure-sal...
I think you are suffering from what I term as "the other reality distortion field" which is where people are blind to the actual facts on the table.
There is a huge difference between the legendary portrayal of Microsoft by the tech media and the reality.
Just watch the reality doesn't bite you on the arse one day.
When I read ScottGu's (a fantastic manager at Microsoft!) blog I always think: If I was ever using cloud, that would look nice.
I was not aware that I could run all this stuff on our own servers!
Yes, one desktop. One mobile
> online services,
That everyone else also integrates with. Apart from live/msn email accounts, which are exclusive because it doesn't expose any sane interface (unless it changed with the move to outlook backend?)
> private/public cloud and you can integrate anywhere.
I don't even know what that means. Integrate anywhere?
You know what else could have the same description? Nokia/Maemo - spans linux desktop, linux mobile, online services (can connect anywhere), private/public cloud (it's just an account), can integrate anywhere (whatever that means). And where is it now? Dead.
The comparison to Maemo is completely wrong. Maemo didn't have any of this ecosystem. There was no "Nokia Drive" or "Nokia Office". The best Maemo could do was run recompiled Debian packages, and that didn't get you much (I know, I had most of the Maemo devices). Microsoft's cloud platform is light years ahead of what Maemo/Meego was delivering.
Microsoft: * Elop leaves of his own accord * Microsoft continues to make money but fails to create any new markets * Elop runs Nokia into ground with Microsoft's conspicuous help * Get Elop and his now shattered company back at Microsoft's hour of need (?) * ???
Do they even have profits to accelerate on?
Now Microsoft being on top has an important decision to make. To force itself onto Nokia, or learn their ways. In other words, they can suffocate Nokia's engineering culture, or relearn it from them.
The later would be the best option for everybody including us all. However, I don't have much faith in the managerial class to play this right.
So I have to agree I don't see Nokia staff in a great position regardless of how Steve spins it.
I foresee more changes in Nokia than in Microsoft (being Microsoft the acquirer that shouldn't sound strange).
But, is this the most desirable?