The Scribd Story and the Trip Method
scribd.com
scribd.com
I absolutely don't get it how such a service adds value to the web. It's great for scribd to have 60 million readers. I am one of them. Why? Because I'm freaking forced to sign up to download a pdf.
"A social publishing company that aims to liberate the written word by democratizing the publishing process for everyday people". - Sounds great. Could you please provide the link?
I hate scribd because it's not a PDF. I'm still not sure what was wrong with PDFs in the first place, but replacing them with an in browser, Flash based thing is insane.
Oh, and as for selling ebooks on the web. What's wrong with Lulu? That's where I can sell a PDF of my GNU Make book and offer people the option of buying a printed copy.
BTW Can someone post a PDF of this?
XLibris is a good alternative which is quite cheap in bulk.
I'm still not sure I see the point of Scribd, because I had no problem reading PDFs and the like on originating sites before it came along, but hey. Also, we desperately need a new namespace. I am so sick of cutesy homonyms. It's like that phase a few years ago where all edgy books/movies/ articles had a title of the form 'Verbing the Noun'.
It started with A way for academics to publish online more easily and ended up with A social publishing company that aims to liberate the written word by democratizing the publishing process for everyday people.
This reminds me of that old Tom Lehrer joke about how the problem with folk music is that it was written by common people. If it had been written by professional musicians it would have been good. There are a lot of crap writers out there, giving them a platform doesn't improve anything. Not even for them. If you're a crap writer and can't get your work published you always have the mental salve that the publishers are against you. Once you can upload your crap to scribd you'll discover that it wasn't the publishers after all, it was that you suck. Which is better?
Writing is not easy and barriers to entry (such as editors or agents) actually help filter out a ton of crap.
The assumption that publishing should be democratic is ludicrous as the only books published in a democratic world would be pap that panders to the unwashed masses.
For the aspiring writers out there, the best essay on writing I've ever read:
http://www.elizabethgilbert.com/writing.htm
"Magazines, editors, agents - they all employ young people making $22,000 a year whose job is to read lots of manuscripts and send back letters telling you that you aren't good enough yet: LET THEM DO IT. It's their job. Don't pre-reject yourself."
I've bought random books off Lulu. Most of them are average, as in you could probably write as well, given knowledge of the subject matter. Some of the Lulu books were travel accounts, chock full of navel-gazing type introspection. I think I bought those simply to read about what their trip did for them.
Also "Trip method unit"? "Ideation"? That quality/time graph? Is this a joke?