Sweden authorities abducted a child because of homeschooling
hslda.org
hslda.org
If you want to believe Wikipedia [1] (since I'm not a lawyer and not even remotely sure about the specifics of the laws in question) the same thing could happen here in Germany.
I doubt that is even close to the full story here, and a site that fights for homeschooling probably wants to push its own agenda first and foremost.
This seems to be a tabloid headline, with biased/incomplete/weird content behind the link.
1: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulpflicht_(Deutschland)#Vol...
In practice, of course, free education is a great privilege for most families, but I fail how you a free society in congruent with this law. I'm Swedish, but have left the country. The quality of Swedish schools is less than outstanding imo.
What about private schools?
Germany requires the same (Homeschooling isn't allowed, except in very specific cases -> A child that cannot be transported/isn't mobile at all for example).
For me that is The Right Way. The same education for everyone. If the public education sucks, we need to improve that not work around the issue.
And .. the majority of reasons for homeschooling are plain invalid in my world (often based on religious ideas, claiming that the curriculum is containing 'forbidden'/'evil'/'wrong' stuff).
'Free society' doesn't imply the right to do everything. You cannot drink and drive. You're not allowed to beat your (very own, hey you made those!) children. For some, myself included, the requirement to send your kids to a 'real' school is a necessary thing and not Restricting The Freedom.
You're free to disagree (both in Sweden and Germany), but in that case you need to decide if that freedom is important enough to warrant a move - or you can try to lobby against the majority/the status quo. Ignoring the state and law (as the family seemed to have done) or calling it wrong won't help.
Aren't there private schools in Germany where the wealthy send their children? If there are, then why shouldn't everyone have the choice to opt out of the public school system, not just the wealthy?
Not home schooling.
What if group education is the problem? Parents being allowed to teach their children is a human right, and it's only very strange countries that block it. It smacks of government indoctrination.
> And .. the majority of reasons for homeschooling are plain invalid in my world (often based on religious ideas, claiming that the curriculum is containing 'forbidden'/'evil'/'wrong' stuff).
I guess the government indoctrination is working on you. (Did they run some propaganda ads to make you believe such a strange thing?)
No, the reason most parents homeschool is that they can do a much better job, because you don't have to spend half of the day on useless structure and discipline. By doing that you free up so much time that kids can learn twice as much as non homeschooled kids. Or they can learn other subjects not normally taught, or they can explore their interests.
It's not for all parents of course, it requires a good commitment. But homeschooled kids end up with much better educations that regular schooled ones. There have been many studies in the US on this subject and the results are very clear: Homeschooling works much better.
> 'Free society' doesn't imply the right to do everything. For some, myself included, the requirement to send your kids to a 'real' school is a necessary thing and not Restricting The Freedom.
Of course it is restricting. You have just been brainwashed. A society can make up any rules it likes, and I guess you'll go along with it.
But you have to have a good reason for the rules. And there is no good reason at all for the ban on homeschooling.
In my world parents can teach their children everything - on top of the regulated, quality-controlled standard education. Why? Because otherwise you cannot control that a child receives decent education. And no, brainwashing (to use your term here) your own child or deciding that math and biology are not relevant, but let's do just sports instead, is not a human right.
Education is. Home schooling offers little benefits and leads to huge problems (regulation, quality control are my biggest issues with it).
> It's not for all parents of course
Oh? Really? So .. we should decide on a case by case basis? Maybe ask for a 'driving license' to teach your kids? I think we have a degree in Germany that involves something similar...
> Homeschooling works much better
No. And quite frankly, I couldn't give a damn about the US here. Show me the sources and I'll probably find out that most of the 'home-schooled' were privileged rich kids where people bought their way out of the 'normal' way. And probably all the nutjobs (again, you have a couple of interesting religious groups in the US that like your concept as well) are excluded from the study. But hey, surprise me and find me a relevant study?
> Of course it is restricting
Oh man.. The US way again. Freedom > everything else, right? Without starting to point out that you don't live in a free country according to _my_ definition: We don't even agree on the priority of things here. Germany has no free speech as you know it. And I want that to remain the way it is. My (liberal, pirate party voting) peers largely agree. This isn't 'brainwashed' or stupid, that's a difference in culture, a model of values that doesn't match your own.
And let me close with a stab of my own: If this is the way you like to lead an argument, I doubt that you're able to school a kid. "Those Germans? Brainwashed. They do atrocious things, show naked skin on TV, supress free speech and take kids away. In the night. Before they eat them"
No, it's because you disagree for patently stupid and obviously wrong reasons, and you don't even see it.
> Because otherwise you cannot control that a child receives decent education.
Sure you can. You give quarterly tests. And not on a case by case, automatically - no permission or application needed, but your kids need to pass the test.
> Oh? Really? So .. we should decide on a case by case basis? Maybe ask for a 'driving license' to teach your kids?
Nope. You ask the parents themself. There are a minority who are nuts, but 99.9% of people are perfectly able to decide if they can teach their kids the needed subjects.
The testing will help find the obviously unqualified and the rest run their own life, just like people have been doing for thousands of years.
Do you trust the parents to educate their kids about morals and behavior? Or are you going to have the state do that too? Actually, why not have professionals raise the kids in group homes and forget the parents completely?
> Show me the sources and I'll probably find out that most of the 'home-schooled' were privileged rich kids where people bought their way out of the 'normal' way.
Your brainwashing is showing again. You are simply wrong. Go lookup your own sources, nothing else will convince you.
> Actually, why not have professionals raise the kids in group homes and forget the parents completely?
Funnily enough, that is vaguely similar to what was offered in East Germany and the general trend here is to actually provide general daycare for your child, so that the mother (if we're talking classic roles) can take up a job again. It's even a big part for the upcoming elections here.
I'm not a fan of that myself, but I cackle with glee thinking about the fits that this discussion ("Hey, why don't you give us the child and go to work during the day") might throw you in.
Bottom line: Your values are not compatible with mine. They are not relevant for my decisions. I doubt they are relevant for Sweden either. Stop trying to believe you are morally superior in any way.
Neo nazis, radical extreme Muslims, Christians and Jews, Hippies - they all say very similar things for home schooling.
This is the same kind of freedom that allows people to not vaccinate their children or to spend millions of dollars campaigning against Vapor Trails or Muslim-Sympathising-9/11-Commemorative-Sculptures or god only knows what other loony nonsense.
Withdrawing your child from schools because schools are lousy is valid, but feels like a sad and selfish defeat. Why is education still run by people who ignore evidence? Why is education still in the grip of politicians?
No, they just send their children to private school.
> Neo nazis, radical extreme Muslims, Christians and Jews, Hippies - they all say very similar things for home schooling.
No they don't. You have just been brainwashed by your government. You and darklajid both have very bizarre views about homeschooling - whoever is in charge of propaganda is clearly doing a good job, but he is not doing a truthful job. (Also go read my reply to him https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6316449 )
It is stunning to find a modern country abusing human rights this way, and using a propaganda campaign to make their own citizens actually believe they are doing the right thing!
I did not realize it was this easy to manipulate people with outright lies.
I do get the sense there's quite a bit left out of the article.
In Swedish but they refer to the court documents (Google Translate):
"The man came driving straight toward the son and the foster mother in a car, got out, pulled her son into the car and drove away from the scene. The man then switched to another car and slept two nights with her son in a barn and another outbuilding like space."
"The father was sentenced to prison for the unlawful detention, and has had restraining order against son with an extension until at least last fall."
"The boy lvu: was, among other things because he had been physically abused. The judges consisted of caries (!). When parents would move him to India at the age of eight, they had not vaccinated the boy. It was then that assistance was on the plane at Arlanda. Having grown up in Sweden and move to India without preparation of vaccinations can be dangerous. It was not about a charter trip to Goa, and even then, many people tend to take photos vaccines."
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&art...
"But the police do not come and take children who do not go to school. Emma Östling says this stopped in the 1980s. So there has to be a bigger issue for the local authority to justify taking a child away. This means that the local municipality's social department must have decided that the familiy's home was not a safe place for the child."
"Domenic himself has made it clear that not want to meet his parents or even talk about them."
Not something you would expect of a child forcibly removed from loving parents.
From what I read, the parents sound like a couple of douche bags that are more interested in themselves than the child.
Dissenting opinion to the decision to keep him in foster care agreed that the care under his parents was insufficient but that foster care may be over the top.
Maybe someone who speaks the language can read the court documents and tell us what this one sided story is leaving out?
Don't know if it's biaisd though.
It seems homeschooling was legal and the parents had a very good reason to do it even if it wouldn't be (the upcoming move to IN).
I fail to understand why they wouldn't comply when the state started to demand that their son visits a 'normal' school though. They fought a dangerous battle with a state they planned to leave. I wouldn't have dared to do that, the minimum damage would've been a hefty fine, the maximum .. happened.
At least I'm far more sympathetic after reading this timeline than after that OP's link..
Of course, after they're published a few stories it's no longer "news" at which point they'll find some other statistically unlikely tragedy to flog to the ghouls.