Tech From a 30-Year-Old Sears Catalog
wired.com
wired.com
And the word "Ridiculous" in the headline is a kind of throwing stones in a glass house as far as Wired goes. I have a CueCat that proves it.
Hmmm, in the '70s is was more like Popular Electronics, which famously launched Microsoft (I wish I'd saved that issue!). And I found the Heathkit catalog to be the most interesting in this direction; heck, they even had an LSI-11 (PDP-11 on a chipset) based computer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathkit_H11).
But it's telling the Sears catalog devoted real estate to a glossary of computer terms (last item in this article); there was a lot of educating to do to develop customers back then. I was also impressed that most of the terms were still in use, even if we aren't using floppies any more.
1) I was in the Atari 8-bit camp
But while those magazines reached millions, Sears catalogs reached an order of magnitude more than that. Possibly two orders of magnitude.
Companies bent over backwards to get their products noticed by Sears. If your product made it to the catalog, that was the 1975 equivalent of being bought by Google. Atari fixed a last minute glitch that almost kept Pong from being carried by the company:
http://books.google.com/books?id=lKZriBxbcwQC&lpg=PA41&ots=D...
True. I dropped Wired when the ratio of ads to content (not including content that was essentially ads) became ridiculous. They're a catalog.
At least Sears never refereed to their publication as a "magazine". Maybe if they included some advertorials they would have done better.
They were so close. They started the Discover CC, the Prodigy computer network, and were the largest retailer nationwide. They shut down mail orders two years before Amazon launched.
http://www.metafilter.com/62394/The-Record-Industrys-Decline...
The Sears "Catalogue" is also still alive and well. The 2013 Wish Book is 700 pages: https://secure.sears.ca/catalog-request
Great trip down memory lane for my generation. Thanks.
Before they stopped making it, I always though the solution to stopping many wars would be to airdrop them into the countries fighting and see how much better the world can be.
Today that is naive I guess.
The inability to simulanteously fund a superpower-level military establishment while enabling a rich "lifestyle" for the people led Gorbachev into the economic and governmental reforms that ultimately undermined the regime.
http://my-retrospace.blogspot.com/2011/10/catalog-15-more-sl...
They made them unchanged from the mid 70s to the turn of the century, a good quarter century run.
The prices in wikipedia are ridiculous. 40% off, yeah whatever. My K1000 body was barely over $100 new in the very early 90s. I bought lenses on sale and they generally set me back $50 or so each, roughly a high school kids weekly part time job paycheck.
The differences between my K1000 and my father's old spotmatic were the spotmatic used a threaded lens and the K1000 used a bayonet mount (like a BNC connector, kinda) Also the spotmatic required a now unobtainium mercury based battery. Not mercury added to lower internal resistance like modern alkalines, but mercury itself was an electrode.
I agree the UI on the K1000 kicked butt. Trivial to adjust while shooting, fast, simple. No modern camera app comes close because of hardware limitations. Also image quality was vastly superior especially with lower ASA films and even a cheap high school student lens.
Wikipedia devotes quite a bit to the problems in keeping the games running: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon's_Lair e.g.:
"The life of the original player's gas laser was about 650 hours; although later models had solid state lasers with an estimated life of 50,000 hours, the spindle motor typically failed long before that."