How an Intern Stole NASA's Moon Rocks
gizmodo.com
gizmodo.com
...What? You honestly want me to believe that NASA had secret research on the origins of the universe squirreled away in one of the most secure locations on Earth? That's borderline conspiracy theory territory.
What made that file worth hiding in the same vault as the lunar and Martian samples?
Maybe a boring scientific reason like the vault was environmentally controlled so the clothbound journals were better stored there?
Its not only climate controlled, but protected by a variety of security measures. All of these are expensive. So you would assume that whatever goes into the vault would have to be worth these expenses.
Then again, people are people, and tend to shove things where they'll fit. Another interesting point: NASA listed the journals as stolen, but Roberts denies he ever had them.
That's the hottest scene in a geek movie ever.
Sounds really cool, but that's not what Class 100 is. From Wiki.
Cleanrooms are classified according to the number and size of particles permitted per volume of air. Large numbers like "class 100" or "class 1000" refer to FED-STD-209E, and denote the number of particles of size 0.5 µm or larger permitted per cubic foot of air
I smell more than just a little embellishment.
The cool thing about artistic license is supposed to be the readers never see it. It's supposed to meld right into everything else.