The studies about meditation are mostly of dubious quality and origin, and people draw unwarranted conclusions from them.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/08/21/quacks-eve...
The studies about meditation are mostly of dubious quality and origin, and people draw unwarranted conclusions from them.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/08/21/quacks-eve...
I think you have to pause and reflect for a minute when you say things like: "I can't believe so many intelligent people are fooled by it". Maybe they aren't the ones being foolish... ?
A link to skeptics dictionary: http://www.skepdic.com/tm.html
TM recruiting literature is full of charts and graphs demonstrating the wonders of TM. Things like metabolic rate, oxygen consumption rate, bodily production of carbon dioxide, hormone production, brain waves, etc. are measured and charted and graphically presented to suggest that TM really takes a person to a new state of consciousness. Some of the studies done by TM scientists simply show that some of the same physiological results you can achieve by relaxing completely are achievable by TM. Nevertheless, according to TM advocates, tests have shown that TM produces "neurophysiological signatures that are distinctly different from relaxation and rest "[Judy Stein, personal correspondence]. Critics disagree.* The particular value of these physiological changes one can achieve by meditation have not been shown to be unique to transcendental meditation.
EDIT: Another interesting read: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/2013/03/08/r...
"The Transcendental Meditation movement publishes scores of "peer-reviewed" articles in minor journals attempting to prove the medical benefits of their seated chanting. Reputable studies show that there are, however , no benefits beyond standard relaxation techniques." Source:http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Transcendental_Meditation
So it just makes sense to talk about that one. The others ones aren't really researched that well. Which variation would you prefer?
These anti-quackery people aren't really operating in full scientific rigor mode.
There are dubious claims about the benefits of meditation floating around though. I've seen a business peddling a "meditation-based program" which claims to cure cancer. Made me sick to the stomach.
That's more than shocking and depressing -- i's often illegal. If a person makes such a claim within the covers of a book, it's legal, but if he makes the claim as part of an advertisement, promotion or speech, he can be prosecuted for (among other things) practicing medicine without a license.
Life Pro Tip: If a bunch of people smarter than you believe in something, maybe it is time to stop and critically think.