Porsche on the financial brink
telegraph.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&sid=aMBk...
I'm still a bit confused as to what caused the takeover to fail. The Bloomberg article makes it seem that it was mostly a regulatory problem. Or is it more that Porsche doesn't have the cash to exercise its options in VW?
Edit: the Economist article posted by anigbrowl explains it better.
Three things thwarted Porsche. In January the firm increased its stake in VW to its present 50.8%, almost tripling its net debt to €9 billion in the process, just as sales at Porsche’s car business were tumbling—leaving less cash to pay the interest on the debt. Second, conditions in the credit markets made it harder to go on borrowing more. On March 24th Porsche was able to roll over its existing loan only by pledging its VW shares to the banks and promising to pay back €3.3 billion within six months.
Third, Porsche was counting on the repeal of the so-called Volkswagen Law that restricts individual shareholders to 20% of the voting rights, regardless of the number of shares they own, and gives the state of Lower Saxony a veto on major decisions. The law’s abolition would have allowed Porsche to use its anticipated 75% stake in VW to get its hands on the bigger company’s cash reserves, which stood at €10.7 billion at the end of the last quarter.
But despite a recent amendment by the German federal government, the law still guarantees Lower Saxony’s veto. The state’s premier, Christian Wulff, sees Porsche as an opportunistic would-be plunderer. With his support and that of Bernd Osterloh, the head of the powerful VW works council, Mr Piëch feels he is in a position to dictate terms to Porsche.
And if you are really interested in capital machinations and strategy, I would recommend reading all the Economist stories in chronological order (use Google rather than their lamentable in-house search engine) for the blow-by-blow treatment. It's a great story which will likely become the subject of a book next year, and might even make a good movie. Sadly, one German investor was so badly hit by Porsche's aggressive financial strategy that he committed suicide after losing billions of Euro when Porsche made its famous 'short squeeze' play.
I just can't understand this kind of thing. If someone has enough money to be making bets in the billions, you'd expect them to have at least a few million put away somewhere for a rainy day. Why not just take that and run off to the Carribean or somewhere, start a new life? It's not exactly hard to get out of Europe.
Killing yourself!? Geeze, it's only money.
BTW, the german guy was an old tosser just waiting to see what kind of cancer would kill him. Not much of a loss to mankind, I'd dare to say...
The car is prone to oversteering, so if you push it too hard around a corner, you can lose control and spin out.
Looks like this this is what is happening to Porsche. Quite ironic really, their financial position taking on the characteristics of their signature vehicle.
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1854760,00....
I could spend $40k on a 3-series, or half of that on a used Lexus, or a quarter of that on a used Mazda 3.
Ask a girl sometime whether she'd rather date a man who drives a BMW, or a Mazda 3. That's all the information you need right there.
For the whole $40k you may be able to find an early Porsche 997 (like an '05) with little if any noticeable wear.