This is pretty much an analog of how trespassing in a public accommodation, such as Walmart, works.
You're welcome until someone tells you otherwise. You can't legally go back in just because you changed your shirt and put on a hat.
You're welcome until someone tells you otherwise. You can't legally go back in just because you changed your shirt and put on a hat.
If you scroll past the first few pages, you can read the EFF explain in detail why this is a problem http://ia601209.us.archive.org/33/items/gov.uscourts.cand.25...
But this doesn't show a misapplication of the law as it's currently written, either.
It's more analogous to having something on your property you want everybody walking by the street to see. Then you put a tarp to block your annoying neighbor from viewing it but anyone else is still welcome to it.
Would the neighbor be trespassing every time he walks by the street and looks at it?
They say "no shirt no service". You show up with a shirt and get service.
You get blocked from one ip, you show up from another you get service.