On a more general level, I like it that they've designed the RAM and CPU slots to allow easy upgrades. At a $200 MSRP, I would certainly get one (or even if they drifted up to $249). The specs are very good for such a small machine and I wish them every success with it.
I think the main advantage is that these batteries are cheaper and easier to replace.
Edit: Or a battery pack like described in the article.
How about a "dustbuster" style hand-vac with replaceable batteries? That would be awesome!
My Mum bought a BT cordless phone for a landline, and the batteries were 40 pounds. A new phone only cost 25 I think, so she bought a new one when it ran out.
Why would you want to pay extra to get 8 cells bundled together in a pack when you could just get 8 cells individually?
Not only are you getting closer to the commodity part rather than an assembly that's specific to the device in question, you also gain the ability to replace individual cells when they go bad.
Running on AA-style cells like that is a huge plus to me; I hope other manufacturers pick up on it.
Anyway, I share your sentiment.
I bought a netbook lately, Asus Aspire One. It cost £179, and a new/spare battery for it costs £80. That's just obscene.
edit: ACER Aspire One.
That's why we pay so much for Psion handhelds now
Here's a photo of the inside of a Dell: http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/lithium-ion-battery1.ht...
It's pretty trivial to build the charging circuit into the device and let the end user swap out the cells directly, but doing that gives up the obscene margins that manufacturers charge for replacement batteries, and (although I don't buy this as the actual reason) might conceivably lead to more damaged devices due to users swapping cells improperly, reversing the polarity, or mixing cell types.