Intern’s death puts banking culture under microscope
blog.sfgate.com
blog.sfgate.com
Generally people work ridiculous hours because they want to. They do it because the environment is highly competitive and the rewards can be huge. It is not the place for sensitive people, or indeed people with ethics and morals. It is all about the buck$ and screw the rest. People that can make money are Gods, even if their decisions only make money in the short term, no-one cares - all that matters is the next quarterly result and the annual bonus.
There is a reason that Merrill Lynch is now called Bank of America Merrill Lynch, their short term decisions came back and bit them in the ass and they got bought out. I doubt that any lessons were learned. Lots of lip service but I would be beyond stunned with surprise if any meaningful changes have taken place - the fact of this intern's death probably means I am correct, although of course nothing has been determined as to any link or otherwise.
I am probably over dramatizing here but if you value your soul, stay the heck away from Big Investment Trading & Commodities Houses.
i'm sure in a few weeks (if not ALREADY) this guy will be the going-joke around the offices as "don't pull an X. don't be the guy who can't handle the grind."
- Liar's Poker
It's unfair to stereotype bankers this way. You could find books that similarly portray politicians, lawyers, etc. I know a few bankers and they're not like that at all. It's a mixed bag.
I've also heard far worse jokes in the kitchen of a restaurant. You want to be offended? Thems' a good place to start.
Not that I'm saying they're all like that. But they're not all arrogant or cynical. Maybe workaholics.
On the other hand, this sort of humor emerges even in high school among guys. If a group of bankers not very connected to him hear about it, I could see a joke like that beinf said. But the same could be said of any profession. That's humanity for ya.
The most insane period of work I had was when I worked at another bank and we had to put in place modifications to a system by a certain date, otherwise a downstream core trading system was predicted to fail (by capacity management) and the bank would be out of that particular market.
Even that was only every weekend for 6 weeks or so and regular nights of 9pm+
As an aside note, I'm always amused when I hear my tech friends lambast investment bankers' crazy work schedules and then go on to brag about pulling an all-nighter Thursday and then hit up a hackathon after work on Friday. (Just because you get free beer and t-shirts doesn't mean its not unhealthy.)
Hah. Overeating and binge drinking, probably.
Hmmm I love getting down-votes when I don't agree with the circle jerk.
He had been late to work that morning and had parked in a board member's parking space. A security guard was sent to ask the trader to move his car. The trader was mid-deal and angrily waved the security guard away.
Seeing this, the trader's colleagues asked the security guard to keep asking him in order to wind him up further. In the end the trader snapped, threw his car keys at the security guard and said "It's a 3 year old BMW, and I'm doing a billion dollar deal. Just keep the fucker."
I had it relatively easy - working for a small firm, our hours were more in 50 to 80 hour range - so not nearly as stressful as many. But it was still pretty brutal, especially when things got busy.
I worked with good people and it's not true that all bankers are insanely greedy and immoral. I met some of the best people I've ever known in the banking world, and also some real scumbbags. But one stereoype is true: just about everyone I worked with was insanely driven and incrediblely competitive.
Already a skinny guy, I dropped at least another 10 to 15 pounds due to the long hours and no lunch hour. Most of the guys simply ate soup at their desk so they could get more work done. I remember my out-of-town girlfriend coming into town for a rare weekend visit and I spent 8 hours at the office on a Sunday. That might have been the day I vowed to quit.
So I started saving my money like a miser, and after a few years had enough in the bank to quit cold turkey. Had no idea what I was going to do, but just let them know I was done at the end of my two-year commitment.
At my going away party, the wives of my co-workers secretly told my girlfriend she was incredibley lucky I was getting out and were happy for her.
I ended up starting an eCommerce business and have been doing that - and loving it - for the last 5+ years. Apart from marrying that incredible woman who stuck with me when I was in banking, leaving to pursue a more balanced life was the best decision I've ever made.
If anyone is interested in the full story, I wrote a blog post about it here:
If I had had to create a financial model from scratch - or put together something really complex at hour 80 - that would have been a MUCH harder task.
Thanks for answering the question :)
But I really didn't need that much to start my business - time to work was what was most important. I started my business (drop shipping eCommerce) with $1,500 and did sweat equity for the rest. I wanted to save that money to live on so I had maximum time to invest in bootstrapping.
Each month..
Say what you want about the industry, most people who leave it leave it with cash in their bank account.
Although, working 100 hour weeks definitely helps you save the money you do earn--since you never have time to spend it.
Sorry for my ignorance, but what exactly did your work as an investment banker consist of? I see below that you mention "cranking out loads of monotonous pitch books that didn't require too much mental energy". Is there any reason work like this couldn't be delegated to a separate person? I guess my larger question is whether or not the 50+ hours of work you needed to do could trivially be split across multiple people, and if these people would have to be highly skilled.
I'm asking this because it seems to me that a lot of investment banking falls into either building models (could you clarify exactly what that means in the i-banking context) or making presentations to clients/other investment bankers. I could imagine these 2 things being split up in a way similar to what product managers and software engineers often do.
But...finance? I can't imagine even Black–Scholes required that kind of crazy dedication.
He was not a banker himself, and was known to play Super Mario Bros. in his office and spend his evenings at comedy clubs. And he had a bigger impact on finance than arguably any banker since JPMorgan, without working their hours.
Perry Mehrling wrote a great biography of Black which I can't recommend enough.
http://www.amazon.com/Fischer-Black-Revolutionary-Idea-Finan...
The reason such a strange system exists is the top positions are so lucrative but it's hard to screen for the right abilities so they base it on brute work ethic.
I'm not defending, just explaining.
What many people in finance haven't realized is most of the industry is an IT problem. Much of the work I see involves ingesting data, analysing it, and reporting on it. Most everything else is sales.
Most of the people doing this work come from a finance background and only have a rudimentary understanding of IT or programming. Many know Excel and PowerPoint pretty well, and those tools are pushed to extremes.
The work I see being done by junior analysts is often manual IT work. You wouldn't believe what goes on behind the scenes assembling the statements and reports that are sent to clients. It can be surprisingly difficult to sell software in this environment, because many stakeholders would rather get another junior analyst than solve the problem with software. There are some enlightened firms when it comes to technology, but I would say that is the exception.
Ultimately what I think is going to happen is that companies that are built from the ground up around a technology infrastructure will become more efficient and win business from traditional companies. It will take a long time to displace the bigger players, but it will happen. WealthFront is a good example of a financial company that is built around technology. Eventually these types of firms will win out in the market.
Update: Here is an example of the type of work I see analysts doing:
Manually copy data from 5 different systems into a spreadsheet at the end of the month. The data always has flaws, so go back and validate the data and resolve the issues. When the data is clean, do some processing on the data in the spreadsheet and create some graphs.
Then cut and paste output from the Excel spreadsheet into 150 client PowerPoint presentations, and combine that with commentary saved in an Word document from another department that is stored on a network drive.
At the end of the month an analyst will work 80 hour weeks to complete this in 3-5 business days. This type of workflow is not uncommon.
If you knew how dirty most financial data is when it is released, you would probably be checking your statements more carefully.
A huge part of what i-bankers do is pitch - either pitch to a company that you'd like to bring on as a client, or pitch to potential buyers of your client (and variations of that). Junior guys basically make the presentations for those pitches. There's generally horrible project management going on at the senior level as well, and senior team members have no qualms about making you make pointless updates to a presentation (for example, update the numbers in the presentation for the stock price today even though nobody will see the presentation for a week, and you'll have to update it then anyway). In fact, it's sort of part of the deal.
There's a lot of waiting implied in this for the juniors that are doing 100 hour weeks. For up to half the day they're goofing off, surfing the net, and looking busy. Then they crunch spreadsheets, and write pitch books.
Other divisions have similar hierarchies, but a little less busywork. Research spends a lot of time writing models and coming up with research papers, pitching trade ideas.
In trading, the hours aren't necessarily that bad, though they can be for juniors. Trading hours are 8-10 hours a day, but the jobs are hard to get so juniors spend a lot of time trying to look and impress.
I think if we were to make an analogy of "information as alcohol", a programmer's mind is like an installation that only works well with very "distilled" information (say "vodka" and "whisky" :) ) and may work ok with "wine", but it completely sluggs down if you give it "beer" (completely undistilled information). In some domains (medicine is one that I know of), information is so undistilled, diluted and corrupted that it's basically the analogue of "beer with piss in it and rats swimming in the kegs" ("the rats" are my analogue for the "mud minded" people that "just don't get it and never will" and prevent smart geeks from actually doing their jobs)... that's why I wouldn't touch it with a 100 foot pol and I imagine lots of people feels the same about these areas. I imagine this part of finance is a similar "beer pool".
1. Excel work. Valuing companies or modeling a merger or acquisition or financing. Sometimes it goes beyond this, but that’s the bread and butter of what you do in Excel.
2. Writing (PowerPoint or Word). For pitches you’ll write slides on industry trends, executive summaries and explanations of your analysis… for deals you will create marketing documents that “sell” your client in Word or PowerPoint.
3. Research. This can be finding reports for senior bankers, doing industry research, or Googling for hours on end trying to find the adoption rate of cell phones in a southern province of Kazakhstan.
4. Administrative Tasks. I hope you like scheduling meetings, taking notes, and sending out status updates to your team, because you’ll be doing a lot of that.
The kicker was he told us while it'd be tempting to just go home and sleep after we left, we should instead head straight to the GYM and workout for 30 mins, then go to the bar for a few hours because it would keep our "sanity". Hah.. sure, you know what else would keep you sane? QUITTING and working elsewhere.
You know, all of technology is one giant constantly accelerating system.
well, if the kid was working in M&A he was working FOR the innovator trying to get his acquisition done.
truth is, if there wasnt as much hustle in IB, deals would fall apart. lots of deals need momentum to close.
That's why many of the wealthiest people you meet around the world got wealthy by working directly in property or finance.
Would you care to describe the mechanism by which middlemen get less of the economy without a public market? Because that is not the experience of assets without public markets. (And, indeed, this is why investment banks make most of their money away from "the stock market.")
To use an example which many HNers are intimately familiar with, if you happen to have $100,000 to invest towards your retirement and decide to park it in an index fund, you will pay approximately $150~$500 a year for the privilege. If you were to invest it via a venture capitalist (who specialize in making markets between people who have money and people who have companies in the absence of public markets which can connect them), it would cost you $2,000 a year and 20% of your investment gains... in the unlikely event that your VC of choice had positive returns. Also, you wouldn't be allowed to invest in the first place, because the VC model does not include talking to poor people like yourself.
We used to have pensions in this country before the 401k loophole was exploited. 401k was never intended to be a middle class retirement vehicle. Instead of just pocketing the matched 401k funds, it is required to go to wall street where they take a percentage. Built in customers, even though 75% of managed funds perform worse than index funds. It's a joke.
Think of a nine-week show called The Bankers Ordeal that would use go-pros to record every moment of the grueling work schedule that would not stop until one of the contestants fell. A riveting tribute to the allure of capitalism, how heart rending to see the contestants lined up at the start; one of them sure to die in the service of the only god our society worships unreservedly. Truly it would be a revival of the ancient tradition of the sacrificial lamb.
Good bankers know how to manage expectations. Who knows what this kid was working on, but it's easy to ask the graphics department for presentation help, the India team to pull some data, other bankers for help with numbers, etc. There's literally nothing he could have been doing that someone else in his firm hadn't done before.
Erratic hours are part of being an investment banker, but what this kid was doing to himself sounds completely unnecessary.
Analyst jobs are extremely competitive to land. It's an intensive interview process, and the vast majority of analysts do an internship first and are then hired on full time for the following year. As you might imagine, the job pays very well. Market rate at a bulge bracket firm for a first year analyst is $10k signing bonus, $70k base salary, and anywhere from $0 to ~$85k in bonus, though typically bonus is in the $55k - $75k range, depending on individual, group, and bank performance. As a second year, base and expected bonus each receive a $10k bump. Plus dinner is paid for every night, and lunches as well on weekends, which adds up to about another $10k. Most banks have a two year analyst program. A small percentage of analysts stay for a third year if offered (maybe 10%), and maybe 50-75% of those continue on to become associates, which puts them on track to eventually become a senior banker. Most associates were never analysts, but were instead hired in after doing an MBA.
After putting in the time as an analyst, a host of other opportunities await. Those with bulge bracket investment banking experience get all sorts of attention from recruiters. Many go on to work in private equity or for a hedge fund, both of which tend to pay significantly more than banking but with much more sane hours and a far better quality of life. Others do things like biz dev or take other misc finance roles. A very select few decide to go the startup route (eg this guy).
The combination of perceived prestige, high pay, and quality exit opportunities draw legions of juniors and seniors to apply. Senior bankers know that the role is in extremely high demand, and therefore they tend to be very tough on their analysts. If one analyst burns out, there are hundreds more frantically trying to network their way in to take their place.
There's a very clear divide between what a senior banker does and what a junior banker does. Senior bankers are glorified sales people. Their job is to maintain relationships (and develop new ones) with clients so that when the client decides to do a deal (any sort of M&A, financing, or restructuring), they'll hire the bank that employs said senior banker to execute/advise on the transaction. A junior banker's job is to do anything and everything that senior bankers tell them to do.
Junior bankers have very little control over their own lives. They're staffed on many projects at once (at one point I had 12 different projects I was juggling), and usually have minimal say on what projects they're assigned. These projects are generally all with different sets of people. Each senior banker tends to have a sub-industry and group of clients they cover, but junior bankers get shuffled around to work on any project that needs staffing. This staffing is determined by a "staffer" (usually a semi-senior banker), which is entirely discretion based. They try to make an effort to make the distribution of work equitable, but they have their job to do outside of being a staffer, and being a good staffer doesn't advance their career in the slightest, so they're not incentivized to really get this right. The work generally goes to the analyst that looks/seems the least busy.
I can't begin to describe how fucked up of a dynamic this creates. Insidious, underhanded politics. Analysts essentially forced to stay at the office until everyone above them has left the office regardless of whether or not they have anything to do. If you leave before the staffer leaves, you're guaranteed to get hit with the next staffing. If you leave before everyone above your level has left, they'll be bitching the next day about how they're working so hard even the analysts are leaving before them. Analysts subtly dropping hints to senior bankers about how much harder they're working than the other analysts, both in an effort to get staffing diverted away from themselves and because analysts all get ranked against each other at the end of the year, which determines their bonus. Analysts are ranked on a bell curve against each other, and bonus payouts among them are a zero-sum game. Recruiters and interviewers will ask you point-blank what your ranking and compensation was.
Analysts carry a blackberry with them at all times, and a staffing can blow up their next two weeks literally at any moment. You live in constant fear that that little red light blinking on your blackberry isn't another staffing or fire drill (ie "emergency" work that needs to be done immediately). You can't plan anything. Being too slow to respond to emails, including at midnight on weekends, is grounds for getting sat down for a stern conversation in a conference room. My blackberry was never more than 20 ft away from me for two solid years.
My average day was about 9:30am - 12:30am on weekdays, and about noon to 6pm on weekends. I didn't have my first day off, including weekends, until 4 months into the job. Sometimes it was as light as 50 hours per week, and sometimes as bad as 110+. Some of the time you actually have so much work to do that you're eating every meal at your desk and working solid the entire time, especially if you're working on a live deal, but a lot of the time you're just waiting around for other people to get back to you. They give you some work to do on a document or presentation, you spend a few hours doing it and get it back to them, and then you wait for them to get it back to you for another round of edits. You'll usually be doing this with 4 or 5 projects at a time, all with varying levels of complexity and urgency. This is one good part about the job. During the "day shift", life usually isn't so bad. A lot of times you can get away with long lunches and frequent starbucks runs without anyone really noticing. But then after a fairly leisurely day, come around 5pm or so, the "night shift" starts. You'll get edits to do for all of your projects at once and occasionally end up pulling an all nighter, even when the majority of the work you're doing involves formatting charts, transcribing pages of handwritten notes, and various other trivial, mind-numbing tasks.
You'd be amazed at how much effort we'd be asked to expend on some task relative to the benefit that that task could possibly hope to provide. Like put together this 10 page weekly update for every company in X industry, including what research analysts said about them that week, what the media has said about them, individual product sales, graphs of their stock price movements and their valuation multiples, etc. All painfully slow, manual work. There were 40-50 companies in this industry. For an update that was sent to a single client. Unsolicited. When the CFO hated the senior banker who ordered the update and would never do a deal with him in his life. Doing mind-numbing work is one thing, but spending hours and hours doing it when you know it's all for nothing is an indescribable feeling. I wanted to bash my head in with a stapler. It took me THREE MONTHS to finally convince the staffer to tell the senior banker it wasn't going to happen anymore. All sorts of absurd shit like this was thrust upon us in the name of potentially winning business.
I could keep going and probably fill several volumes about how horrible of an experience it was, but I'll stop there. The best day of my life to date was the day I turned in my blackberry and walked out of the building for the last time. I don't think that the people I worked with were inherently evil or anything like that. All else equal, they'd be senstive to our well being. But at the end of the day, we were just another class of indentured servants, like the many classes they'd seen before us and the many they'd see after.
When I would describe my life to friends and people I'd meet that weren't a part of the finance world, they would literally think I was making things up. The idea that someone would be willing to subject themselves to such insanity, or more accurately that an employer would demand it, wasn't part of their world view. I assure you, it was really that bad. I'm a pretty stable person, but there were a couple times where I came very close to coming unglued. Somehow we managed to convince ourselves it was all worth it. The jury's still out on that one.
Your last paragraphs made me wonder: where are you now? Did you leave finance entirely?
It's tough learning how to code out of school, and we could use more business-oriented people who grok technical stuff.
Thanks for sharing, I had heard stories like this, but never knew it was that bad.
The second year was very different. I stopped learning new things. I started thinking about what I wanted to do next, but all of the traditional exit ops seemed like more of the same bullshit to me. I started thinking about doing venture capital, then realized I'd rather just start a startup myself. This all took several months to figure out, and I needed income (I have massive student debt), so I stayed in the job in the meantime. I also didn't want to prematurely cut ties with the people I was working with (leaving before your two years are up is highly frowned upon). I spent any downtime I could find reading about startups. In late winter/early spring, I convinced a couple friends to work on a startup with me, and we used applying to YC as a means to focus our work. We actually got invited to interview, but didn't get funded. At that point, it was May, so I only had two more months to go to finish out my two years and get my bonus, so I trudged on and closed it out.
This is why I dropped out
Can you imagine what damage such a person can do if they succumb to survivor bias? If they use all that is in their power to propagate their life choices as the right life choices for everybody?
No wonder the social contract is being ripped to shreds.
And somehow everyone was convinced this was the right way to go about things.
This is/was also frequently true of startups. In fact my founder did this sort of working binges. You may say "BUT she owns the company" and I say "yeah, but at the same time the chances of a big exit (we didn't get a Instagram exit) are really really small, not to mention the failure rate.
I also worked full time and had a startup on the site (which failed) for like 6 months. And somehow I convinced myself it was all worth it.
I think the moral of this story is: No matter the industry... ITS NOT WORTH IT!
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/21/us-banks-hiring-id...
Is suicide really the word that should be used here?
Jumping off a bridge is one thing, jumping off your office building is another. But going into work and seeing if you can grind yourself out, that takes motivation. You'd have to feel the need to perform your job well, which gives you the feeling of stress. It doesn't strike me that a suicidal person would knowingly choose their work as an avenue of death.
I don't think there is a right word for it. Its not really murder because the employee more or less did it voluntarily. And its not really suicide because there was no intention to kill oneself.
Death by overworking is about as good as it gets imo.
Only, I doubt the premise. Productivity will fall at some point. And in your startup you only care about productivity, not about impressing people with your actual hours. (You might want to impress people with tales of your alleged hours..)
Also... Imagine if something even remotely similar happened at Walmart.
Here, it gets cheaper clerk-hours per dollar with part laborers surviving on food stamps.
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/perspectives/foo...
Whenever someone like Moritz pulls 8 all nighters, there is some greedy, selfish, entitled, son of a bitch, benefiting from that.
When are we going to realize that capitalism is not the ideal and "free" system we idealize it as?
... which was in the article, for those of us who read it.
>Whenever someone like Moritz pulls 8 all nighters, there is some greedy, selfish, entitled, son of a bitch, benefiting from that.
Yeah, that greedy, selfish, entitled, son of a bitch was Moritz Erhardt. You don't get this kind of internship by accident, nor are there press gangs roaming the street looking for people to force into investment banking.
>When are we going to realize that capitalism is not the ideal and "free" system we idealize it as?
You have an odd notion of freedom. Did B of A keep him chained to the desk, you figure?
The only way to create a safe working environment for everyone is to legislate it. Look how effective OSHA was. All I'm suggesting is to legislate that companies could not assign work to employees beyond what human capacity can handle.
To you, it is "freedom" to allow the corporation to oppress the worker. To you, "freedom" is to say "do whatever you want", and allow the corporation to oppress the worker by controlling his income. To me, freedom is not just "do whatever you want" the government will stay out of it. Freedom is being able to live like a human who is not constantly enslaved by some master, whether it be a corporation or a government. To achieve that, we need to keep corporations in check, since they will always have their claws around every worker's lifeblood, which is more than enough to take someone's freedom away instantly.
Working more than 8-10 hours a day is crossing into dangerous territory.
Your assertion that if someone doesn't like it they could just get up and leave is naive, since the problem will always be perpetuated by thousands of other oppressed workers in line to take his place.
Well, your twisted definition of the word aside, that's what freedom is. Nobody had a gun to Ehrhardt's head (unlike you, I wasn't on a first-name basis) - he was doing what he did for his own benefit. Would I have done it? No.
But he wasn't a child. He was an adult capable of making his own decisions. There's no need for legislation, particularly in light of the fact this is news because it's highly unusual.
>To you, it is "freedom" to allow the corporation to oppress the worker.
If by "oppress" you mean "allow the employee to decide for himself what he's willing to do", then yes. That's freedom.
>Your assertion that if someone doesn't like it they could just get up and leave is naive, since the problem will always be perpetuated by thousands of other oppressed workers in line to take his place.
With his skills he would have had no trouble finding a job that didn't require more than 40-50 hours a week. We're not talking about unskilled labor here.
It always struck me from my personal interactions with them that lots of what tech industry interns do is have a good time...
Usually though IBD/Corp Finance Summer work consists of assisting with pitches which includes menial work like powerpoint design, spreadsheeting, pitchbook creation etc. If they are on a live deal work may include due diligence etc.
I have a STEM education (PhD in Organic Chemistry) and consider myself a bright person (you are free to disagree). The guys that I knew that were good at banking were very skilled and intelligent. There is no way I could spend an afternoon in training and perform at their level.
Could you spend a year and get up to speed? Sure.
And compared to your intelligent banker friends, you could absolutely be up to speed in six months, in terms of technical skill, industry knowledge, product knowledge. If you can master o-chem, you can master corporate finance. Check out the rest of this thread for more descriptions of the work...your qualifications are way overmatched for what the work actually is.
And he was right.
Attitude is what separates good bankers from bad bankers.
I don't disagree, although arguably M&A requires less specific domain knowledge for a new starter than say what might be required within structuring or DCM teams. Also I'm curious as to why you left banking?
On top of that, everyone knows how to do a sales pitch, most are comfortable in a suit talking to execs, and classes in marketing, management, accounting, and computer science are all mandatory.
Finance courses at a proper business school are highly demanding, and the technical abilities of the students who attend are on par with any STEM major...
Reread my comment, I could take a kid with a "good attitude and train them to be a good summer intern in an afternoon." In fact, I have actually done that. Let's define what I mean by "good." Week 1: a good summer intern needs to know how to make PIBs, bind books, spread comps, use Google, learn from mistakes, and most importantly, know when to ask questions. Of course, as they get real experience and prove themselves, they get more responsibility -- just like with any other job. For example, I've had superstar interns building merger models for live deals after a couple months.
Knowing the "basics" (Excel, Bloomberg/FDS/CIQ, etc) isn't that important on Day 1 since they'll learn those things. I mentioned STEM students, in particular, because they can usually speed up the learning curve.
And remember, I'm talking about banking. Trading is a whole different animal.
They work a normal work week. 40-45 hours/week. No clue what we pay them, but they are paid and provided housing. We usually hire a few of them full-time when they finish school and they're generally very successful employees.
I assume they have a good time. They're 20-21 years old; I hope they do. Stressing at a desk sounds like a pretty lame way to spend your 20s.
It does not have to be something important. The person requesting the research may hardly look at it. But there is always work to be done. When you think about it, there is so much information in the financial world that there are a million things one may want to see researched.
But do they also treat their tech/engineering employees like this? I can't imagine an engineer working 80 hours on Wall St. when they could make quite good money Facebook, etc. as well.
These companies take advantage of young, immature people that are still finding their way and learning life's many ropes. Unacceptable.
Either way, i found this topic kind of a "uneasy" to discuss in many industries, mostly because the glass houses.
Why single out this industry? Every company I've worked for large enough to have an accounting department lives and breathes by those evil spreadsheets.
I have cousin who worked for Nomura in London and 100+ hours per week are normal thing in IB industry. I doubt that all-nighters were mandatory for interns, but it is very competitive environment and there are dozen of other interns/students waiting for opportunity and ready to do it. Someone wrote its for the face-time but nobody pulls all-nighter for face time.
It eventually came at 4am. He basically sat around for 8hr waiting for it.