RIP Microsoft Tag
facebook.com
facebook.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Tag
Unfortunately, the way it's designed, every barcode is just an ID number that points at a Microsoft server, which then forwards the client to the actual URL. Once these servers shut down, every Tag code ever used will break forever.
Which is great. Pretty funny joke Microsoft is playing on whoever made the mistake of using their products.
This real-world (not actually parody) QR code instruction pretty much sums it up: https://twitter.com/peteashton/status/349499283038433280/pho...
and the google trends for qr-code http://replycam.com/i/Google_Trends_-_Web_Search_interest__q...
so yes, nobody uses QR-codes, and the people who used it are gone now, too.
iOS 7 adds QR code reading APIs to the system, but still doesn't support it in the OS outside of importing paper tickets into Passbook.
edit: URLs are so user-unfriendly that in parts of Asia they've simply ditched them from advertising and just show a graphic of a search box+button with their brand name in it, hoping nobody will SEO snipe them.
They're too trackable and mostly used in throwaway applications. What looks better in a bean counter organization on someone's end of year review or resume: "Managed the delivery of 1M pieces of promotional direct mail" or "Managed the delivery of promotional direct mail resulting in 7 QR code accesses". Both can be true at the same time, but only one is making it to the review/resume.
J6P has no idea how to create a QR code. Yes yes all of us on HN know how to use google to find everything from web services to CPAN modules but J6P does not. So using legacy MS Word you highlight a URL and right click and ... Or using modern google docs you highlight a URL in the text and ? So QR codes are a write once by techies technology. Wake me when a girl scout troop leader can put one in her newsletter.
Finally they tend to be pretty ugly. Not a mandatory requirement, but for all practical purposes they're used as an eyesore. Now a decent graphics artist can take a startup domain name like drkoop.com and apply all manner of pretty font and color formatting, and play other style games but QR codes are mostly applied as any eyesore. In theory they can be embedded in a low contrast manner or in a textured area but they you get the epic fail of users not even knowing there's something there to scan, because QR code equals ugly so no ugly means there's no QR code.
Apparently, this has happened in the past and it sounds like there are multiple security firms discouraging this practice, but not sure if it's even stopping them.
It's partly poor word choice (e.g. generic terms) and also perhaps a big assumption that people would be using particular search engines that has more of a liberal advertisement scheme.
QR Codes are awesome!
If it's just an ID number, what is the extra capacity for?
(which I made in a fit of apparent prescience last year.)
Contrast this to Google, who shut down key services regularly with little warning and provide appalling levels of support even for paying customers.
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/custo...
WTF. An advertiser. The single word you wanted is an advertiser.
Now I see what's actually up, and it's a shame, since I liked Tag.