What are the main pros comparing to, lets say, VLC?
What are the main pros comparing to, lets say, VLC?
Minimalism is also something people are interested in. mpv has 1/5 the code of mplayer and 1/6 of VLC but still has relevant features.
They appeal to different kind of users. For example, even if I am in the mpv team, I will recommend VLC to my 'average Joe' friend as I know he would be put off by the CLI usage and config file editing.
I think many distributions would consider mpv a duplicate of mplayer, so for one to be packaged officially the other would have to be removed. Realistically that's not going to happen anytime soon.
In the past VLC used to display wrong colors or downgrade video quality for better performance, not sure how it is now (possibly a bit better).
Relevant: http://www.cccp-project.net/wiki/index.php?title=Media_Playe...
Don't be fooled by simplified mpv --help output. :)
Usage: mpv [options] [url|path/]filename
Basic options: (complete list in the man page)
--start=<time> seek to given (percent, seconds, or hh:mm:ss) position
--no-audio do not play sound
--no-video do not play video
--fs fullscreen playback
--sub=<file> specify subtitle file to use
--playlist=<file> specify playlist file
There is much more in man page.https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/blob/master/DOCS/man/en/op...