The Flattening of Ebook Sales
roughtype.com
roughtype.com
As the person who produced the AAP report quoted here, I'm not given enough characters in Comments to point out the countless errors in this piece. It misunderstands our basic data and, since our reports only track current vs previous year, quotes figures that come out of nowhere and are unrecognizable. It misses the widely-reported fact that Q1 2013's overall eBook growth slowed because of the Children's/Young Adults category: The Q1 lead-up to the Hunger Games film in March 2012 drove C/YA eBooks to extraordinary triple-digit growth; minus a comparable blockbuster in Q1 2013, C/YA slowed. Adult Fiction/Non-Fiction eBooks, however, grew 14% in the same time '12-'13 period.
Also, an essential point is missed: These are not retail sales numbers but, instead, publishers' net revenues coming from all their distribution channels including Institutions (e.g. schools, libraries) and Book Fairs. That also means, for instance, that with Borders' financial troubles no longer a factor, publishers have seen their net revenue from print stabilize which, in turn, affects their overall percentage earned from eBooks in these reports.
Finally, the piece's premise that an eBook is an eBook is an eBook is wrong. Each category within consumer books - Adult Fiction/Non-Fiction, Children's/YA and Religious Presses - has moved into e-formats at different points in time. Adult F/NF was the pioneer, starting years ago, and that growth has become more consistent as it's matured. C/YA, which entered later, is now in the midst of enormous transition. Religious Presses are more newcomers to eBooks. Lumping these distinct categories together and making broad generalizations makes little sense.
We release highlights of all our reports to media (including the Post). We're happy to share. But an article based on a non-journalistic blog that itself has only second-hand information does a disservice to readers, authors and publishers.
Andi Sporkin Association of American Publishers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/08/e...
It's written like a rebuttal but I read it as an addendum.
I am the author of the original blog post. I'm not sure what exactly Ms. Sporkin read, but although she accuses me of "countless errors," she doesn't actually specify any of them. The AAP numbers on e-book sales growth that I used come from AAP reports on 1st quarter book sales from 2009 to 2013. Yes, they are current year vs. previous year numbers, which is precisely how I describe them in the text and chart. And yes, they are for the overall e-book market, which seems a reasonable way to illustrate overall trends in that market. I agree, of course, that examining segments of that market would also be useful. Nick Carr
I think a lot of factors are influencing this trend, but I don't buy that DRM is the problem. As rude as it may sound, I doubt most of the general public even knows what DRM is. Well, the data itself shows that the majority of consumer book sales are going to paper, so that argument may be moot anyway.
Newer generations probably won't purchase nearly as many paper books (or digital, even) as older generations. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out. The market will probably shrink and be taken over by short-form work designed for tablets and e-readers.
2. Habits are hard to change. What you are most accustomed to when growing up, you tend to continue unless the advantages of change is overwhelming. Current e-book formats do not yet offer huge advantages over paper books, thus many adults keep buying paper ones. (Some advantages, like physical storage space & weight, are big, but confined to specific situations, say during travel, as mentioned in the article.)
3. New generations of kids are more and more distracted by digital interactivity and communications. I suspect the average amount of long-form reading per person in the developed world has declined over time. (Does anyone have an estimate?) Long-form narratives like paper books and current e-books cannot now hold attention of most casual readers, especially the young. Even though I did not grow up with a computer and read many books as a child, I now read quite a bit less books and many more short items on the Web (articles, blogs, forum posts, etc.).
4. Over time, when the new generation of digital natives grows up and technology progresses, e-books would gradually but surely dominate the reading market for all types of books. More importantly, popular non-fictions will be developed as a new kind of e-books, which cannot even be fully presented in the traditional narrative form. Al Gore's Our Choice [1] is just an example of the first generation's interactive e-books.
And the browser in the PaperWhite is really handy, when I'm on the go ill, often leave the tablet to home and use my kindle to read HN or The Verge.
Just a random anecdote :)
And i still buy physical books, too.
When purchasing an ebook reader is as trivial as buying a pocket calculator...then you'll see a massive shift in the proportion of ebook sales vs print sales. (Also, it would be enormously helpful if ebooks could be purchased WITHOUT a credit card...afterall kids buy books too.)
I would also like to throw in DRM & proprietary formats. First, you are using something like a Kindle you are licensing content. If Amazon goes away, I wouldn't be surprised if your content does too. That would make me nervous if I was heavily invested in some ecosystem.
But another interesting theory, not mentioned in the article, is that there may be a difference in reading speed and comprehension between paper and screens (although I have seen conflicting data on this).
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=reading-pap...
One fascinating idea from this article is that "As far as our brains are concerned, however, text is a tangible part of the physical world we inhabit."
Personally, I comprehend information much better when its in some format like PDF which is not re-flowable. But most books these days, available from Amazon or Apple, do not meet that description.
Maybe I'm an odd one, but my ideal reading device would probably be some 13" tablet that could display a whole PDF page at a time.
I break DRM on all the Kindle content I buy. If I couldn't break the DRM, I wouldn't buy it.
I also try to support non-DRM books by buying them preferentially. Baen books, for instance. There are other non-DRM publishers. And no, I do /not/ share.
I have a Kindle DX for reading papers (e.g., from the ACM). I haven't tried reading conference papers on a tablet (e.g., iPad) mainly because I don't have one, and while I wonder if the experience is better, I like the fact that the Kindles don't have to be recharged every day. The fact that I can go a week or more without recharging makes them a lot more book-like to me.
I didn't understand this part. Why would tablets usage reduce e-books sales if you can read e-books on your tablet all the same? If the author means the DRM issue, then it's not really the case, since there are many DRM free e-books sold already, and even with DRMed ones, DRM can be removed in most cases in order to access them on any device you want.
The argument hinges on the idea that people pick up tablets only so many hours of the day and then decide what to do. I think it's flimsy because using a tablet is a different act than wanting to read a book.
Assume also that you take a fixed-duration journey during which you entertain yourself with your e-reader or tablet.
Time spent reading = journey length - time spent doing things other than reading. Number of ebooks you buy = reading speed constant * time spent reading
So the relation is:
Number of ebooks you buy = reading speed constant * (journey length - time spent doing things other than reading)
Does this clarify things?
Not in my case at least. I buy e-books irregularly, only when I need one, or interested in particular one and etc. I don't buy just for the sake of buying another one. Also, if there is a sale on something, you can buy it to read in the future, just because there is a good deal. So I don't think constant buying rate for e-books which is equal to the rate of reading is a good general assumption.
I guess it depends on how long it takes you to read things, and how easily you can find things you want to read :)
No. You would buy a hard copy or a real e-reader so that you could actually read it. Tablets are just terrible for book-reading and apple killed the e-book market with the release of the tablet. Hopefully someday it will recover, but after spending so much money on a toy few are eager to buy a real e-reader.
No idea, since I never had a dedicated e-reader. I prefer a general purpose tablet which can be used as e-reader in addition and also can run free software without any DRM to begin with. What benefits does dedicated e-reader have?
Those are the only benefits I can think of. But they both make and break the e-book experience. Reading an e-book on a tablet? Wouldn't cross my mind, ever. I'd much rather buy the book. Read an e-book on a e-reader? Yes, please - I'll gladly pay more than the book costs if I have to (which I do a lot of the times).
I have several problems with this. You can't carry many books with you, and you need too much room to store them. If I really really need something that I read quite regularly, then sure, I'd buy a paper book. But in most cases I'd prefer a digital book, and I have no problems with reading it on a tablet. May be there are DRM-free hackable e-readers out there, but I didn't research this.
Yes, DRM is an issue. Personally, when paying about the same or more for a DRM-e-book than for the real thing I consider it fair game and morally acceptable for me to strip the DRM (no one can claim that I'm getting a cheaper version because of DRM when the DRM crap costs more than a physical book).
Currently this is childs play so I'm gambling somewhat on that this won't change or my e-reader won't be able to new books from certain places.
Of course, this makes me a criminal.
About "criminality" of breaking DRM, this nonsense is really annoying. More people should support campaigns like this one: http://fixthedmca.org
DRM can be removed in theory but most users won't make it through Calibre and the necessary scripts. In addition, in many countries, removing DRM is illegal, and in almost all countries, offering software, knowledge etc. on removing DRM even for legal purposes such as personal use is illegal. Removing DRM is therefore not an approach compatible with a mass market.
I really hate Calibre, and I can't understand why someone hasn't forked it and released a limited set of tools just for DRM stripping. Obviously this is legally difficult but certainly do-able.
> In addition, in many countries, removing DRM is illegal,
It's weird that I am committing a criminal offence if I buy a DRMd ebook and rip it to a format I can use, but I'm not committing a criminal offence if I just download a DRM-free version of the same book.
Of course that doesn't change anything legally but technically making a simple "GUI" to de-drm ebooks is something that any high-level programmer could do in a few minutes.
It's "illegal" while it shouldn't be, since it bans fair use (format/device shifting). So in practice people simply ignore nonsensical "laws" like these, since they "place unrealistic demands on reality" (the way Cory Doctorow phrased it). So removing DRM should be compatible with mass market no matter how many nonsensical laws will try to prevent it and tools to remove DRM are distributed through services hosted in countries which don't have such nonsense like DMCA 1201. It applies even to such elementary things like libdvdcss which one needs to play DVDs on Linux.
Large media producers of all stripes are notorious for conflating their sales with all sales. That makes for a particularly egregious practice here, where indies may account for 30-40% or more of sales.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sjRD7NSec#t=3m57s
So ebooks only growing at 5% with 25% market share surprises me. At that rate it will take ebooks 10 years to draw even with print:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Solve%5B0.25+*+1.05%5En...
This gives the impression that the publishers don't give the e-books as much priority as the print editions. Given this fact, I don't see how they can complain if e-book sales are hitting a plateau.
This held steady until around November of last year, and then suddenly declined. Today print sales are nearly 2x that of the Kindle sales.
The important data point is that the Amazon sales ranks of both have remained steady.