Any claims the FISA court is not a real court fail hard if the above is correct. Which is pretty much has to be for the current system to work.
Any claims the FISA court is not a real court fail hard if the above is correct. Which is pretty much has to be for the current system to work.
extraordinary rendition
waterboarding
indefinite detention in a location beyond the reach of the judicial system
shoot to kill via drone
spying on the populace on a scale that the stasi could only dream of.
Spying on allies as well as enemies
What kind of a regime is that?
It might still be secretly legal, though.
I don't know about the USA, but the UK government recently passed a law stating exactly that.
And they want to abolish the Human Rights Act. I can't think why.
[1]http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/20...
Secret imprisonment would be a clear indication of totalitarianism, but doesn't, as far as we know, appear to be happening on US soil.
You keep saying FISC "is not a real court" and is some kind of optional decoration on top of powers the executive branch already has.
So, which is it? Does FISC have judicial branch powers? Or do these penalties amount to administrative detention in judicial branch drag?