Richard Dawkins should revisit the letter to his 10 year old daughter

tirania.org

14 points·mindstab··4 comments

I might be mistaken, however I think that Dr. Dawkins was trying to stipulate was the content of the talk by Dr. Tyson at the Beyond Belief conference (2006).

Here is the link to that talk [video]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7rR8stuQfk

(It is quite long, but in my opinion worth the watch)

TLDW: He presents evidence of the rise of religion being a major if not the major contributing factor to the downfall of critical thinking, most significantly saying that people invoke a religious philosophy of ignorance at the end of their knowledge, and this is quite dangerous to scientific thinking.

RTFA. He says the Jews (religious) do well, but Muslims (religious) don't- so what is his point?

The author speculates that it might be linked to socio-economic status more than religion.

For the record I am an atheist, but I disrespect poor arguments from anyone, theist, agnostic or atheist.

His (Degrasse's) point was that when there was a spirit of critical thinking that was permitted, there were great advances in science, whereas when that was stifled (I do believe that the jews did not have such a rigid religiosity enforced upon them) they lost their ability to do good science.

That I think was also the point that Dawkins was trying to make.

It is very likely and probable that socio-economic status is a causal factor, however the point being made is not that that is untrue, it is that there is another one of (likely) equal importance.

Presumptuous. We may as well tell the author of this slam that his mother, daughter, wife, sister, best friend, butcher, and dentist are all embarrassed for him.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com