Yeah I wish the HN mods didn't change my title. Saying it's from 2011, or that the mystery is now reopened, doesn't do the article justice. It provides highly compelling evidence for the exact identification of Satoshi Nakamoto, most of the tech public is not aware of this hypothesis, and the oddity of the responses in the May 2013 update, if anything, suggest the story really has legs.
Sorry but where is the update? I just see a correction about a LinkedIn profile.
Oh good pick-up. Only the correction was May 2013. But no update, i.e. no new information that refutes this hypothesis, is if anything an indicator that this isn't "old news" and is a promising hypothesis that has yet to gain currency (pardon the pun).