Specifications of the planned solar-powered Ubuntu laptop
solaptop.com
solaptop.com
HDD: Seagate 2.5” SATA HDD 320GB
So, not an SSD? Don't SSDs use less power than spinners?
Optimizing price on this one choice is strange, to me, considering they are running an Atom CPU. I'd rather pay $x00 for a model with an SSD and a more power-hungry, non-Atom CPU.
A 120GB SSD would be really nice in this machine.
I'm surprised the screenshots show Ubuntu 13.04 though. Anyone know more about which version of Ubuntu is running?
I do understand they're trying to cut costs to meet the $300 price - I do hope Intel puts out some drivers for this chipset.
I ask because I hate playing the role of dismissive guy on HN but this seems waaaaay too good to be true at anywhere near the estimated price. Even ignoring the solar power challenges a fully rugged design at $350 seems like a huge reach as does submersible at $400.
I've dabbled with solar powered portable electronics. Harsh reality is getting direct sunlight for prolonged periods is problematic.
How visible is the screen in full sun? Are the panels' output sufficient for direct powering, or is power buffering required? How long, really, to a full charge (without having to constantly shift it to track the sun)? What percentage of "full sun" is required for direct powering? Are you really willing to leave it lying out in the open for prolonged periods (rain, theft, etc.)? Not trying to bash it, just looking at the gap between "gee, never have to plug it in, that's cool" and real-world concerns.
From prices I've seen, the solar panels + power electronics alone would run $350.
I also want to know how long it'll last with indirect light. In some parts of the world, we get more days of overcast & rain than sun.
In particular, I don't know what the efficiencies are. Also, I was hoping to find an ARM chip on that thing. Intel ATOM was not that power efficient, last I looked.
While you are correct that there are now some types of Atom which are used in phones, the part used in that laptop has a TDP of 10W. I can't find much information on the Atom which is being used on that phone, certainly not to compare them.
[0] http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/SoC/Intel/CTvKrait/3dgam...
>How many hours does it need to charge?
>A little over 2 hours and you should be at 100%
http://solaptop.com/en/faq/#toggle3664
I bet that's with the AC charger though.
Conversion loss is hard to say, but it's DC to DC so, I would expect efficiencies of at least 90%, so derate the 69 Watts to 62 Watts.
There aren't any specs on this computer's power consumption, but for what it's worth, typical Apple power supplies come in 60, 85 and 100 Watts, IIRC. So this would be roughly like charging with a small mac power supply... depending on battery size, count on about 1-2 hours of charge.
Caveats: this may be kind of thick, heavy and fragile. Also, during the time interval of 1-2 hours, the sun's position will change quite a bit. Panels work best when they're aimed directly at the sun, so if they can be tilted somehow that would be best. It will also need a way to protect the panels from scratches when folded. Demo picture is fake picture.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell_efficiency
With just an LCD screen? bleh. anywhere that would charge it well would be nearly unusable. Not a problem if you just want to recharge it while doing something else (and for that it's still a good idea), but still.
http://www.solcomputer.com/pixel-qi-display-2/rugged-netbook...
But for now, the max size for Pixel Qi is 10.1 inches, and the price is kinda high.
(I'd like to know how replacable the components are, though. An SSD in there would be great.)
For those who aren't native English speakers, SOL = shit out of luck (completely out of luck)
"Darn, the concert is sold out, I guess we're SOL."