The Sun's Magnetic Field is about to Flip
science.nasa.gov
science.nasa.gov
Whether the sun is chaotic in the technical sense (i.e. the butterfly effect) is still open to question [1]. The solar magnetic field is poorly understood. In the 1980s, everybody thought that a particular model (mean-field dynamos IIRC) had it all figured out, but new observations from helioseismology showed them wrong. Wikipedia has a good article on the solar cycle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle My advisor wrote a more technical overview: http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrsp-2010-3/a...
[1] See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory#Distinguishing_ra...
"The sun's north pole has already changed sign, while the south pole is racing to catch up," says Scherrer.
Does that not suggest that the sun is currently a magnetic monopole? Or is that too simplistic?
A possible configuration would be that both geographicals poles of the same sign, but the field around the equator is of a different sign, like a quadrupole perhaps.
Disclaimer: I'm a physicist but not an astrophysicist.
0: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Earths_Ma...
E: Here's a link to one of those maps. I'll see if I can find any better.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_ciencia/ciencia_s...
"Astronomers at the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO) monitor the sun's global magnetic field on a daily basis."
They do observe the movement of plasma in the corona, to check the field lines predicted by the models.
The light spectrum emitted by the Sun has "spectral lines", or emission features (deep dips or strong peaks) that are determined by light-absorption or light-emission from specific elements (e.g., Nickel, Iron, and of course Hydrogen) in the Sun's atmosphere.
If the little packet of stuff that was absorbing light is moving toward or away from you, the characteristic frequencies of all its spectral lines will be Doppler shifted. So, you can measure the velocity of that packet of stuff by seeing how much the line is shifted. Since you have a lot of photons, you can do this independently across the Sun's surface and get a spatially-resolved map of velocity ("Dopplergram", http://solar-center.stanford.edu/dopplergram.html).
If the little packet of stuff was in a magnetic field, its spectral lines will be split into sub-lines due to the Zeeman effect. So, you can also measure the spatially-resolved magnetic field of the Sun, and this is called a "magnetogram".
It is kind of surprising that this measurement can be made at all.
It's amazing how deeply useful Doppler shift is; he returns to it thematically at least twice, talking about exoplanets as well as black holes. "We can't see them directly, but we can see them through the way they interact with other things."
Our UK household plugs and sockets really are a fine piece of engineering.
EDIT: this has to change now, too, right?
Granted, UK-style plugs really are excellent pieces of engineering, best appreciated when upturned and trod upon in the dark.
Source: I was a part time sparky for a few years.
At least they almost immediately mention that it is a common event.
Edit: I guess it's true, HN is forever meant to be devoid of humor.
Also my wife is a member of the "interior decoration means covering your fridge with magnets" tribe, so now I have to flip all of them over. Someone, please create a startup for online classes for interior decorating.
> Wow, our sun is BIG...
Even bigger. The solar system you linked to is not even near to having the correct proportions.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Solar-sys...
Sorry had to, for the confused: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_unit
P.S. Just kidding, don't do it.
last time it flipped was in 2001 [1].
[1] http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/a...
But, correlation is not causation so all remains just pure coincidences.
No it's not, but nor is it a blanket reason not to investigate apparent parallels.
Just because the 'correlation = causation' is used to dis-infrom through findings that are bolstered by correlations, doesn't mean there's no reason to try and explore a reasonable case as to why the correlation reflects actual causation.
Correlation can infer causation in many instances.
What makes you think it does not?
It has been now shown that weather patterns in Europe during the middle ages are correlated with both warfare[1] and witch hunts [2]. Theories that explain these phenomena have been proposed.
The thing is, any astrologer during that period would get the correlation part right but the causal mechanism completely wrong. Move forward 500 years and believers in Scientism (not Science) will take the mistaken causal mechanism, confirm that it does not match with their a priori belief system, and wave off the real correlation as "fudge" or "coincidence".
Sometimes the lack of an explanation lies in the observer, for all/most of the obvious stuff has already been discovered. Lazy evaluation will take you a long way in terms of keeping an open mind.
Its mostly my own ignorance I am admitting. :) I believe the true spirit of the 'Causation is not correlation' phrase is that if the mechanism isn't obvious, don't jump to the conclusion. As your link points out, correlation is a good reason to carry further investigation.
Also, it's worth noting that the US has a quasi-stable cycle of invading other countries for about a decade, then a roughly decade long policy of non-interventionism while they try to forget what a horrible quagmire they got themselves into the last decade.
Earlier one: 1979
USSR Invades Afghanistan, Margaret Thatcher elected as the Prime minister in UK, Ruhollah Khomeini returns to Tehran
(Seriously its interesting the article didn't mention how unusually weak the latest cycle has been. Usually the peak is much higher leading to happier ham radio operators. So the "news" or "journalism" is the unusual weakness of this cycle, but instead we get human interest story...)
Aside from the stereotypical "this individual cycle is weak" most recent solar coverage has contemplated Maunder Minimum effect and stuff like that. The wiki article is pretty good, summary is every time a cycle is wimpy everyone temporarily jumps on the bandwagon that its a semi-permanent long term decline etc etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum
In these ways, its a somewhat atypical solar news story. Which is cool.
Mid way through the opening paragraph mentions several people charged with spying based on surveillance of short-wave number stations.
Source: I work in a solar research lab at the University of New Hampshire