Since font are rendered with smoothing by default, rather than the monochrome option, it's not really a supporting argument.
Since font are rendered with smoothing by default, rather than the monochrome option, it's not really a supporting argument.
Windows gives me the option of having incredibly readable subtly smoothed monochrome fonts and Linux only lets me have smoothed fonts. This is one area (the only area, I admit) where Linux is less configurable, or at least has less worthwhile options than Windows. But text readability seems like the single most important issue to me in an OS, so I have to stick with Windows until I find a Linux kernel recompiled for better monochrome fonts.
Or I need to download a pixel font for all the standard web and system fonts, but copyright makes that illegal and impossible.
edit: here's one from 2003 that sold for $8,400. http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2003/03/28/ibm-t...
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=694...
I might have to reinstall Linux this weekend, if it works I'll write a blog post with lots of pictures.
This guide has pictures of a Linux install with properly non-smoothed fonts. http://avi.alkalay.net/linux/docs/font-howto/Font.html
Slightly off topic, most people who compile a kernel don't need to - they usually need to add a module, which if it isn't already packaged, is easily compilable on its own. Check RHEL 4's release notes (which show how to create a Makefile for a single module).
The compile love of Linux novices comes from old documentation from before kernel 2.0, when most drivers started being available as modules.