What I think is not debatable, unless you think humans are emotionless automatons who cannot be influenced by the treatment of others (a viewpoint seemingly being espoused by several here), is that bullies can be held partially morally^ accountable for the suicides of their victims.
^ I am not saying legally accountable.
You might not think what Aaron did was morally wrong or deserving of negative repercussions, but others might reasonably disagree.
> You might not think what Aaron did was morally wrong or deserving of negative repercussions, but others might reasonably disagree.
That has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion. Nothing in the slightest. If you think that is what this discussion is about, then I have to wonder what exactly you have been reading.
Either way, I don't think either of us is ever going to convince the other of anything on that score, so it's probably best to agree to disagree on it.