Mozilla is understandably wary about new technologies from Google, because it would be very easy for them to make it so that the best youtube experience can only happen in chrome, which would be quite detrimental to Mozilla.
Surely Mozilla adoption of Dart or NaCl would make this less likely, not more.
So there's an incentive to intensely scrutinize everything that Google is trying to do, and only to implement the best stuff. And let Mozilla's projects be specs, or in javascript, or be protocols, and sell the other browsers on them, hopefully getting other vendors like MS, Apple, Google, and Opera to think they're neat enough to buy in.
Though friendly, here's an inherent asymmetry in the relationship between Mozilla and Google. Mozilla should throw around its little market power as hard as it can.
Presumably at this point Mozilla would like to join Microsoft in one of its various anti-trust complaints against Google for having dared to offer users better products.
or they could stop betraying the trust of their users. I mean, seriously. It would be one thing if they were 'only' totally compromising the network security of people who chose to use their software. But they are compromising the security of anyone with a network who lets their friends and family on board.
My network isn't a problem one way or another, I am actually fairly comfortable with the protections it has. OTOH the networks of non-techy people and family across the entire world that have been compromised by google's astounding arrogance(?) and stupidity(?) kind of bother me.
Honestly, I do not understand how an entirely tech oriented organisation like Google could do something like this. I am Jacks bewildered confusion.