- The design firm submitting the project didn't work on the workstation portion of the office, and therefore does not take photos of them
- Professional photos are generally taken after the company has moved in, and workstation photos are too difficult to do when there may be confidential information present. These photo shoots can take many hours, so disrupting employees for a day is not what companies are interested in.
- Workstations are just not as sexy as conference spaces to show off (I disagree, though)
All that said, I like to use foursquare or instagram to browse photos taken at offices to get a real look at the spaces. Here's a couple photos of the workstations:
- https://foursquare.com/v/dropbox-hq/4f3970aee4b08f009b927739...
- https://foursquare.com/v/dropbox-hq/4f3970aee4b08f009b927739...
Those look like totally standard "startup with long rows of desks", although lower density than I've seen elsewhere. Trying to get work done in what is essentially an aisle off of a walkway would suck.
I wish there were a list of companies somewhere which sorted them into private offices, shared offices (2-3 people), team rooms (3-15 people), high cubes, low cubes, work areas for teams in rows in bigger rooms, and "one huge room full of every desk, all in long rows".
I'll shoot you a quick note with some details of a new feature I'm working on that you might enjoy based on what you described.
Actually it's not entirely cynicism, its backed up by experiences I have had.
Open plan = less productivity, higher stress and more sick days. Yet, it remains the new hotness. Drives me nuts.
Dealing with Mountain View rather than SF government is a big win, too.
Downside would be "crappy view".