I would imagine most people did it to submit comments/links.
(function(){
var table = document.querySelector("table tbody tr+tr+tr td table tbody");
[].slice.call(table.querySelectorAll("tr")).map(function(r){var c=r.querySelector("td:last-child");return [c?parseFloat(c.innerHTML):0,r]}).sort(function(a,b){return b[0]-a[0]}).forEach(function(r){table.appendChild(r[1])});
}());Hacker News is an online community. It has a pretty open membership policy, which is that, if you show up here over a period of time, and manage to not get hell-banned, you're a part of the community. Congrats!
Part of being in a community is that it's pretty common to have a kinship with other people in that community. This place isn't a real-life place, so naturally, that kinship might not develop as quickly, or spread as deeply as one might in person. But you'd be surprised that it can still develop.
So, "the vast majority of HN users" might not actually know who raganwald is, but I'd bet they've probably seen at least a few of his comments, at least if they've spent any amount of time here. However, "the vast majority of HN users" aren't actually the community. There's nothing stopping them from being part of it, they just aren't. Which is fine (I don't consider myself to be, for what it's worth).
But when someone who is a part of the community has something good happen to them that's of interest to the community, people share it.
The fact that this story is popular is a triumph of community, not a shitty side-effect of this place not operating the way you wish it did. I hope it continues to feel this way, lest it really turn into a shitty link aggregator that you so wish it were.
Noting last paragraph of this top 10 profile:
Was there ever any claim that "we are all equal" here or something like that?
"How are stories ranked?
On the front page, by points divided by a power of the time since they were submitted. Comments in comment threads are ranked the same way."
I know it's an algorithm but I just feel from observation that that statement from the faq is not entirely correct.
You've been around longer (and have quite a bit of karma) so I'd like to know your thoughts on this. Because to me I don't see ranking on the home page following this faq answer.
And what does it mean to flag anyway? It's possible someone thinks that it is "read later" and another person "this is wrong".
How does anyone know what flag even is for exactly?
From the guidelines > Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site.
Yes, Hacker News is an echo chamber.
I know who he is and I'm hardly a member of any exclusive in-group.
Edit: It has to be pointed out that I was responding to a comment which said "Why on earth is this interesting enough for the greater HN community to care about?" which was in fact a rude thing to say.