Capitalization is obsolete
jmtame.posterous.com
jmtame.posterous.com
It may indeed be useless, but that's another question. Many (most?) other languages have no concept of capital letters; personally, I like it in English - it does convey meaning and enhances readability, IMO.
I like capitals. But I think like many, I don't use them in certain contexts - IM, for example, which is highly informal and, more importantly, every sentence is on a new line. This is why full stops can be dropped there too, and it doesn't look weird or hard to read. But in continuous prose, like here - I would argue they are useful. The post, for example, is just that little bit harder to read for his lack of capitalisation.
The cost is not too high. Compared to glyph-based languages, English is remarkably efficient in terms of character space, so it's not like we'd benefit all that much from a reduced character set. It might indeed help in typing emails but .. I've never really considered that so much of a burden? The proper solution isn't to ditch the capitals, it's to finally perfect continuous speech dictation...
update: isn't the author really proposing that formal speech itself is obsolete?
I used to do/think like that, too. But now that I've been touchtyping for a while I find the cost of hitting that shift key is really close to zero so I don't bother not capitalizing properly everywhere, IM included.
To everyone in this community who still isn't touchtyping: You're missing out. You're missing out!
It's quite fascinating, really, how these things develop. For example:
friend: seen reddit today?
me: no # <-- devoid of further meaning, a neutral tone
me: No. # <-- overbearing and formal, almost a put-down:
"No, of course not. Stop wasting my time."
Language, and its contextual use, evolves rapidly and I would now argue that capitalisation and full stops in IM have taken on a different meaning than when used in regular prose.I don't really see how double-spacing's any different from capitalizing + single-spacing, except the second is much more readable to me.
"i helped my uncle, jack, off a horse."
you need a comma in the above sentence; it doesn't matter if you use capitalization or not.
i helped my uncle, that fellow over there, off a horse.
(b) The latter part of (a) may only apply when read by educated people, but since they're the people that make all the decisions, you should probably keep following proper grammatical syntax for now.
(c) This is basically like telling, say, Arabic linguists that reading right to left is "obsolete"; it's a language construct, it can't just magically become obsolete.
I suppose you could argue that capitalization is a formality, but then you'd have to make an argument against all formal speech. The biggest hurdle you'd have is convincing everyone that talking and writing in "txt speak" is acceptable. There are a lot of people, myself included, who would sooner die than see that day.
Incidentally, I think most people wouldn't take you seriously without the might of the shift key after every sentence ending period.
And rightly so. Somebody who doesn't take any effort whatsoever to convey their message clearly shouldn't be taken seriously. Their reasoning and thinking is likely to be as sloppy as their writing.
Something illustrated quite well by the article :-)
It was substantially more difficult to read than it would have been had it been properly capitalized. I am now convinced that capitalization is not obsolete.
(Also, don't you think it's bad form to self submit your own short blog rants here?)
It's explicitly not bad form as per the site guidelines.
On the self-submission question - I have no problem with it, if it's interesting, and this one is, if flawed. What I don't like is when people repeatedly submit their own blog posts here, every single one it seems like sometimes - I wish that could be programmatically blocked somehow.