Gmail now features ads that look like emails
marketingland.com
marketingland.com
PS: yes I can just get rid of the new tabs and go back to the old layout, and tha's what I did. I just hink the difference made between the main tab and promotions tab doesn't seem meaningful in this discussion.
So the choice is between "Ads in Inbox list + Ads in message view" VS "Ads in Promotions tab + Ads in message view". There's no real difference between tabbed inbox style and the classic inbox styles except presentation if you think about it.
More to the point, I do not want some algorithm "helpfully" sorting my incoming email into different views according to some opaque criteria that I don't get to define or tweak: I want to see everything in my default inbox, no exceptions.
Permitting someone else to sort my mail via rules I have not defined is how important business email gets missed or overlooked.
Exactly this. When I saw the tabbed inbox, my first thought was, "oh, this will be cool", followed shortly by, "wait, I don't get to control or customize this at all?"
Really, why can't I define my own tabs for specific searches/labels? The black box tabs they provide now should just have been defaults within a customizable feature.
Personally I think it's a great feature but one I won't be using because I already have a labyrinth of filter rules that perform the same function.
Stop complaining. Change provider.
Fastmail has servers in the United States (https://www.fastmail.fm/help/overview_about.html), which means the NSA can still request access to those servers.
Nice support, though. One thing that Rackspace is really, really good at.
It uses Open-Xchange as the web UI.
cf. Facebook, Gmail, LinkedIn, Twitter
* Getting in your 2008 Toyota... Tada! An ad presenting the 2013 model.
* Walking by a Nike store... Tada! An ad featuring new sneakers.
* About to make love and for some reason left your Glass on... Tada! A safe sex promotion ad.
Would be amused to see the criteria/logic used to isolate that scenario! Perhaps if Glass was monitoring current room, spoken words, heartbeat...
[1]: http://btsync.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/BitTorrentS...
The answer is always no. I hope I'm believing an illusion, but regardless, I still feel like Google's infrastructure is the only one I'd trust with my emails.
Reliability > privacy for me (for now)
Until you realize half your outbound mail isn't getting delivered because the person who had your VPC's IP before you was a spammer, or because you didn't correctly navigate the labyrinth of DKIM, SPF, feedback loops, and arbitrary recipient mail server policies.
Realistically, DKIM, SPF, and other overbearing qualifications should only triggered if you're doing mass mailings. Ideally, you shouldn't get denied delivery if you're using an unqualified personal server (that, as you mentioned, hasn't previously been 100% blocked due to bad behavior by anybody in the past ever).
Anyone seeing this all the time?