Google Glass has new rival in GlassUp smart specs
itproportal.com
itproportal.com
Technologically heads up micro-displays are a disaster. There has been billions of dollars spent in this space and only millions in revenue. Its a space I've been pretty interested in, (even has a couple of pairs of lame versions) but the problem is so large that even the sub-problems are multi-hundred thousand dollar projects.
I completely understand the desire to run at the problem, but use of indiegogo here? My fear is that crowd funding is this generation of entrepreneurs "dot com bubble."
I wonder if Sergey now has remote assistants playing Amanda Pays' role in Max Headroom? That would be one (unscalable) way to deliver a truly seamless experience.
http://jet.reconinstruments.com/
Recon Jet is a heads-up display for sports [...]. The Jet features a
powerful microcomputer and a full-color widescreen display designed for
active outdoor use, mounted on high-performance polarized sports eyewear.It occurs to me that having emails, tweets or facebook updates alert you is hugely distracting. Personally, I would probably allow SMS on Glass, though, given that they are — in my filter bubble — usually important, used when coordinating and occur rarely enough that it doesn’t distract me. But email? No way!
1) The green text in the middle of the eye is fairly annoying (at least I think it would be)
2) GlassUp seems to not be very well balanced
3) The inability to send data isn't very promising
4) Google has the best maps/navigation thus far, so it seems the GlassUp would be at a disadvantage (then again for the price who knows, it might be worth it).
5) A lot more intrusive that Google Glass
I got the impression that an Android app could use the API to use Google Maps with this device. I could be mistaken though.
[1] http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/glassup-augmented-reality-...
I don't see any indication if the lens can be formulated, it seems like a huge omission to me.
1. Text in the middle: They could move this to the side or the bottom or anywhere else since it seems like it is projected. Google Glass cannot do this.
2. Color of text. I'm sure that can be addressed with alternate colors.
3. Cannot take input other than a smartphone: You mean a camera (listed as an option)? Not sure what else would apply
I'm more surprised no one else has positive comments 1. $199 vs $1500 2. Everyone has a phone today. I seriously doubt anyone using glass is giving that up soon. So, why not just tie the device to your phone. Why replace it? 3. Once it is tied to the phone, the app can just communicate with device. If this actually works and gets adoption, app developers will work on integration. The biggest down is that Google will not which means (as someone else pointed out) no maps integration. That would be a shame.
I don't know if this is the product that will make it. But I know they have the right idea over Google in terms of demand. If google made this at $200-$300 instead of glass, I'd have pre-ordered.