FOIA Machine by The Center for Investigative Reporting
kickstarter.com
kickstarter.com
"MuckRock is an open government tool powered by state and federal Freedom of Information laws, a generous grant from the Sunlight Foundation, and you: Requests are based on your questions, concerns and passions, and you are free to embed, share and write about any of the verified government documents hosted here. Want to learn more? Check out our about page."
This is what the FOIA Machine guys said specifically about that in their application for a Knight News Challenge Grant (scroll down to the competition section): https://www.newschallenge.org/open/open-government/submissio...
* Over 80% of MuckRock's requests were filed with no charge to the user.
* MuckRock has supported filing mass-requests for a while now.
* MuckRock does offer a database including every single state law, example requests to use and modify, thousands of government agencies, and the ability for users to contribute to this growing database.
We also have a tool people can use, today, to file and share requests, with over 5,000 requests filed and almost 1,000 users.
Please explore!
Requests around America: https://www.muckrock.com/place/
News we've broken: https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/
StackOverflow for FOIA: https://www.muckrock.com/questions/
FOIA Machine has been telling me this since 2011, and yet you continue to copy what we deploy, feature by feature. Seriously. I'd love to work together, and I already offered to open source our source code for you, but that's not an offer that has ever been taken up.
I'm always available to talk: Michael@MuckRock.com.
Can you explain what this different angle is?
There shouldn't be controls for sharing; all FOIA requests should be open, as well as the responses. That's the point of the platform.
More social? FOIA officers don't care if your request is social, they care if your request fits within the scope and guidelines of what should be in a FOIA request.
Your angle seems to be the wrong angle. Just saying.
I say "if done correctly" because it currently sounds like it only handles the "send" part of the FOIA request. It'd be a lot more convenient if it also used the Center for Investigative Reporting as the receive address, scanned in and OCRed all the FOIA'ed documents that get received... maybe even have some lawyers pick through each received document and provide analysis + highlight interesting bits, like Groklaw does. Is that part of the plan? (The non-receiving version could always be kept in place either way, for when people want to just get at their own personal records.)
That's exactly how we operate, and we're working more on the "analysis" end of things now (https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2013/jun/25/booz-alle...). Would love suggestions on how we can do it better.
Alaveteli is based on the code that has powered the British site http://www.WhatDoTheyKnow.com/ for several years.
A cool feature would be to crowd fund the feeds. After filing a request and it makes it through to the fee portion, list it somewhere so that users can chip in to unlock a request.