How Microsoft BizSpark Is Doing With Startups, and How It Can Do Better
xconomy.com
xconomy.com
My Dev box is Windows 7 + Python/Django courtesy of BizSpark. I use a WAPP stack (Windows, Apache, Python, PostGres) for production. And, for office stuff, I get to use Office 2007 Ultimate which is really very shiny. The MS office suite is really nice software.
Even if you're a primary Mac user, why not get the BizSpark membership and run whatever Microsoft OS you want on Parallels, just for Microsoft Office? It costs a hundred bucks after 3 years. What do you have to lose?
More fail: http://www.sachinagarwal.com/microsoft-bizspark-is-a-joke
My question can't possibly be the first time he's heard that; I was astonished that he didn't have a pat answer that was productive. When we have scaling issues, we'll have all the traction and revenue we'd need. BizSpark doesn't help us at that point.
But the key point you seem to be missing is that not all startups are web apps. I agree that if you are a Lamp stack web app -- or most any web 2.0 startup -- Bizspark probably can't offer you much. But what if you write Windows desktop software?
There are entire business (some quite large) which build nothing but Office plugins. Never mind the wide range of vertical applications for businesses that almost exclusively run windows. Microsoft's ecosystems is huge and very capable of sustaining quite a few startups. These startups need Windows, Office, and Visual Studio licenses. Of course they will include IIS and Asp.net in their list of benefits. Besides, Asp.net really isn't all that bad of a choice if you just need a company homepage or some kind of low volume or limited access web service.