The previous three comments, from three different people, all seem to think that we're stuck with corn syrup because we can't grow enough sugarcane in the US.
But sugarcane is not the only way to produce sucrose!
Sugar beets currently account for 55% of sugar production in the United States. [1]
What's more, sugar beets will grow in relatively poor soil. Top four sugarbeet-producing states: Minnesota, Idaho, North Dakota, and Michigan [2].
Notice how these are not states renowned for the quality of their soil. Idaho grows a lot of potatoes not because they want to, but because the soil won't support a more valuable crop.
So, we're chewing up our best agricultural land and paying billions of dollars in subsidies to grow an inferior substitute to sucrose. Instead of growing the real thing on our marginal agricultural lands.
It's not even close.
Sources:
[1] http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/sugar-sweeteners/backgr...
[2] http://www.fas.usda.gov/info/factsheets/CAFTA/statesugarprod...