Google Latitude will be retired
support.google.com
support.google.com
I have two problems with this though. 1) the viewer currently only works on Android. An iOS interface is promised, but no web viewer. 2) I can decide who in my circles gets to see my location, but not whose locations I see. Meaning the map view includes people whose location I don't care about.
This is sad, I disklike too many things about google plus, and don't like the amalgamation, I might want to use one product at a given point, and another at another point, but not wanting to be force to use one when I want to use the other.
already feel creeped out when i need to login to youtube to watch a stupid video behind an age block. now you want to link this info to everything else I am doing on the web? no thanks, no need to present me suggestions based on stupid stuff.
What sort of alternative are you proposing / can you give a more specific example?
It makes for terrible interface. If all I want is IM or video with somebody, I was happy with using pidgin from my desktop or an equivalent on Android. By killing xmpp federation, Google forces people still using them for IM to login in G+ and facing a wall of news, feed, forced feed (feed of what's hot), etc...
If I want to check where my friend/spouse/kid is right now, I will now need to log in on G+, which will make me show up as available for IM, face a wall of updates, etc...
I get it they decided to compete with facebook, but I don't like it. There is a silver lining though, people in the open source world were not addressing a lot of those needs, because Google was doing so much better and for free, hopefully we'll see more interesting OSS product coming out (or being re-freshed) to fill the gaps.
Not sure why they close Latitude before supporting their preferred alternative on all platforms.
So, the feature's gone.
One of the neat things is it also sends velocity, and an ETA. So when I get a Glympse message from somebody, it usually says something like "Derrick is headed NE on Rte. 3 at 55 MPH", or something to that effect.
I think in your circumstances this will be better than Glympse, because your use case is about safety and the ambient location awareness, which isn't what Glympse provides. You have to send someone a "Glympse" notification with your location that has a limited window. Speaking from experience, it is hard to send while driving.
This person told me that Latitude was one of the clearest examples of how age affects your perception on technology. The original pitch for Latitude was "Say you're walking down the street and you look in Google Latitude and you find that a buddy of yours is at a coffee shop a block away. This technology allows you to stop by and say hi."
Immediately, the younger part of the board said "That's really cool!" The older part of the board said "Ugh, I just want to enjoy my coffee in peace."
Maybe Google Latitude merely came at the wrong time. One day, maybe location technology will be more appropriate with evolving social conventions.
"If you use Location Reporting and have Location History enabled, your location data will continue to be recorded to your Location History. You can view and manage Location History data on the Location History dashboard."
So you still should be good
It seems to me that having to manage some on G+ and then some in Latitude would be more annoying and more obnoxious.
You never have to see or hear or deal with any parts of G+ you don't want to. You don't have to mix friend groups up or assign people to only one label etc.
With the combining, I need to manage an entire social networking tool in order to see locations. I just want the radio, not a car with a radio in it.
This in addition to convincing people who have never even heard of google+ that they should sign up and manage for themselves, rather than simply accept an invitation email and forget about it.
It's like asking for scissors, and being handed a giant swiss army knife. Sure, it has scissors in it - but they are not as good, harder to find, and mixed in with a bunch of stuff I just don't want or need.
This is hyperbole, you do not need to 'manage' anything. You put people in circles and you are done.
It's also very likely that your friends do have a Google account, so it's not really too far fetched.
Oh and for what it's worth, if someone handed me a swiss army knife instead of scissors, I would just use the scissors on it, but I guess ymmv.
I haven't dabbled much in mobile development, so I really couldn't say how hard it overall would be.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2012/07/05/google...
Google still has a lot more products than Apple but hopefully their focus will mean a much better Android and Google Docs, for example. Google Docs hasn't changed much in years.
Google Docs will likely be integrated with Google+ soon, the document sharing is currently based on GMail groups and contacts, I'd expect them to supplement/replace those with Google+ circles and contacts.
They influence search by increasing the relevance of links by people sharing them or +1ing them. You can just turn them off on the results page it seems but I have found it very beneficial.
Why is it already annoying? The only reasons I've heard have been hypothetical.
Putting people 'in' and joining is functionally the same, that's what I meant.
The reason it annoys me is that I usually want my searches to be objective and global, not influenced by my preferences. I suppose a solution might be if their UI showed the influence clearly.