Why public libraries should follow Chicago’s lead and build maker labs
gigaom.com
gigaom.com
In practice, sharing a lab is an uphill struggle when the people you share it with are your coworkers/fellow students. When they're just people that wandered in off the street, I could imagine that without very careful control of the situation the place will end up with piles of crap and absolutely no tools.
I suppose it completely depends what type of lab they've built. I hope this idea spreads (because I would like to have access to this kind of resource), and I hope it works!
> Why public libraries should follow Chicago’s lead and build maker labs
Article summary (from the article):
> The lab will operate through the end of the year and offer 3D printers, laser cutters, a milling machine, a vinyl cutter and software.
Justification of the title (i.e., why libraries should build maker labs), as far as I can see, after reading the article:
> resources like Chicago’s maker lab will bring in people who might have never had the chance to build something otherwise.
My summary:
Why libraries should build maker labs: Because the author likes them.
http://4thfloor.chattlibrary.org/content/about-public-librar...
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/10/the-un...
http://fflib.org/learn/make/ffl-creation-lab/creation-lab-in...
I've yet to make use of it... but there a few projects I'd like to try out when I have the time.
EDIT The first to have a maker's lab.
As a member and former member of various robot and ham radio groups, shared spaces are a pain to run. They work much better as a paid coop where everyone has skin/money in the game.
And I don't necessarily disagree, but I was just hoping for an argument as to 'why', as the title promissed.