Pico: A simple and fast flat-file CMS
pico.dev7studios.com
pico.dev7studios.com
Maybe this is deliberate, from "Picos [sic] makes creating and maintaining a website as simple as editing text files" but I don't think having the exact same name is a good thing. Maybe a variation?
Without getting too far into a review/investigation, I do feel like a different name would be appropriate. It's already a language and a text-editor, doesn't that just add confusion?
Yes, it "manages content", thus is technically a "CMS". But at the level of many of these tools, so is my file system. At best, these tools are useful automated markdown renderers.
I haven't tried with this system but you can probably use dropbox, and a shared directory to manage multi-user content editing.
I'm not invalidating your criticisms, but search, multi-user support, and localization aren't important to everybody.
Also the sentence "there are plenty of CMSes" is also possibly the most true statement ever made in the history of software.