The end was the only point I was making. The person may be guilty of infractions per law.
To not even be able to reference his right to free speech, if it's upheld I'm quite worried.
To not even be able to reference his right to free speech, if it's upheld I'm quite worried.
If his right to free speech is indeed being violated by applying the law, then modern legal practice does not consider this to be an issue for the jury itself to consider (it is considered in a separate manner, by the judge and by appeal).