Hacker News Reader

It'd be trespass and other crimes on federal properly, so 5 years, no?

How is it federal property? It's owned and operated by an independent quasi-governmental organization.

The bridge is classified as a national monument, which would protect it as federal property.

I can't seem to find a single thing online that supports your statement, either concerning the monument part or federal jurisdiction of the bridge.

Further, it does not appear on this list:

I'm assuming you made an error.