Stalking laws vary state-to-state, but you generally have to prove it is specifically "for the purpose of harassing and intimidating".
See also: paparazzi
See also: http://www.victimsofcrime.org/our-programs/stalking-resource...
Stalking laws vary state-to-state, but you generally have to prove it is specifically "for the purpose of harassing and intimidating".
See also: paparazzi
See also: http://www.victimsofcrime.org/our-programs/stalking-resource...
Ah, I forgot that we are taking US data protection laws into account when an Austrian group files a complaint against an Irish subsidiary.
E.g. in Germany it is forbidden to take photos in public where people who did not agree to it are the main subject – you can still photograph buildings, scenes etc., just not individual people.
And a maaku on HN could easily be this maaku on github from California: https://github.com/maaku
And the 'online robots' and 'direction of the government' almost certainly refer to the recent NSA case, which is an American issue.
So, yes, the US data protection laws do seem relevant to the conversation.