Big screen Kindle: Textbook margins are the real aim, not saving newspapers
blogs.zdnet.com
blogs.zdnet.com
It's going to be a slow road.
Publishers would be much better off building a business model now rather than repeating the RIAA's mistakes.
But as always, existing players mostly seek to preserve income streams, rather than create new ones, even when an unbiased look will show that the existing ones are doomed.
The only publisher I know, offhand, which isn't falling into this trap is Baen Books, and they don't do textbooks. Yet. :)
Plus, it's not like there's a good case for having a dozen different textbooks for teaching linear algebra. Also, if they're digitized, the changes a teacher wants can be made on a course-by-course basis.
I have a ton of stuff to read, but I generate a whole lot more every day. Diagrams, spreadsheets, documentation in every conceivable format...
BTW, if the thing has 3G and wi-fi built-in and makes for a passable browsing experience, it would be great. I would love if it presented itself as a Samba server and a LPR PostScript color printer.
It's sure not that much to ask. Is it?
There _must_ be someone willing to explore this niche. Where's the TechCrunch tablet?
But here's the thing: the full "printing cost" category includes "paper, printing, editorial costs." I'd wager, like most physical media of our day, the manufacturing costs are just a sliver of the actual margin. The value does not come from the grade of plastic on your DVD, it's the content, obviously. In other words, "editorial costs."
These include things like office rent in Manhattan, employee salaries and stuff that's not going to be affected a single bit by the distribution channel. So I wouldn't hold my breath for price wars spurred by the Kindle revolution.
Now, used textbook sales on the other hand, that's a true margin killer.
The textbook business is a well-orchestrated sham that will need gov't intervention if it keeps going this way.
I still fail to see why the thing has a keyboard. Just give me a USB port and let me plug one in, or something similar. 40+ buttons means 40+ things to go wrong. Waste of space, components, and maintenance overhead for a search function that could be implemented many other ways. I'm afraid the thing reminds me unpleasantly of the IBM PCjr.