Binging it on: putting an end to the Google bias
antonpug.com
antonpug.com
Why couldn't there be a search engine run by a non-profit, which does not treat its users like commodities, which respects its users' privacy, does not track them, does not advertise, and is run for the benefit of its users, not for its own benefit?
In the wake of the recent search-engine and web-service provider scandals, I think a lot of people would.
I have a hard time seeing what people think Google does so magically that they see duckduckgo (or any alternative, really) failing at. You either get what you search for or you don't. On top of that you can get to a result more easily by using !bang stuff on duckduckgo.
The very few times I have to depart from ddg I'll just use the bang search and go "!g whatever" and be done with it, honestly. Most of the time, for reference checks I'll just go "!racket library/function" and get what I need instantly.
(This works for a surprising amount of internal site searches, which I think is really impressive.)
I'd do the same for xmonad (or tiling window managers in general) in a conversation that related to that. Because good software deserves mention.
If you don't want to see discussions about search engines then maybe, just maybe, you shouldn't view the comments for links that pertain to that certain topic. It seems fairly idiotic of you to even begin complaining about this, honestly.
I'm more interested in projects like blind search (http://blindsearch.fejus.com/)
It's a peer to peer search engine without any of the privacy problems that come with using Google or, god forbid, bing.
The bad news is that it requires some effort and dedication from its users. Hopefully recent events will convince more people to give it a try.