The fascinating thing is that generic he was an ideological construct in the first place, a top-down imposition that never fully caught on in English despite literally centuries of being proclaimed as proper. Singular they continued to be used the whole time, and is found in most (all?) great English writers. (Jane Austen was particularly fond of it.) I don't have citations handy, but people with similar bees in their bonnets have made sure that web searches won't lack for them.
I agree that the singular "they" is superior.
When I realized that a plural form of the third person could be used in a gender-neutral way for the singular form, I was in awe.
* * *
Trivia:
In French, the common rule is "le masculin l'emporte"[1], which means the "male form wins"; if you talk about a group of 100 females and a single male, you must use the male form "ils" instead of the female form "elles".
[1]: [...] on abrège parfois cette règle en "le masculin l'emporte sur le féminin", alors qu'il serait correct de dire : seul les groupes exclusivement féminin sont féminins, les autres utilisent le genre non marqué.
Roughly translated to : It is more correct to say that groups exclusively composed of females are accorded using the female form, while the other groups use the 'unmarked' form (which is the male form).