Amazon is staffing up for its $600 million cloud for spooks | Hacker News Reader

Amazon is staffing up for its $600 million cloud for spooks

qz.com

76 pointsferdo20 comments

One thing that’s mysterious, and possibly telling, about Amazon’s job announcement for a “Systems Engineer—Government Cleared” is that the location of this job—Herndon, Virginia—may or may not coincide with the location of the CIA’s own cloud computing centers.

This is not mysterious or surprising. Herndon, VA is full of entities doing TS/SCI work. It would be mysterious and surprising if the job announcement was in Kohler, Wisconsin.

Discussion from 3 months ago when the news first broke.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5403733

"Amazon and CIA ink cloud deal"

Hopefully half-billion taxpayer funding to Amazon will bring down consumer prices even further elsewhere in their network.

It's all "fun and games" until that network is hacked and info on half of the United States is copied to a foreign country or a foreign mafia.

I know the area, and their used to be a building that was pretty much known to be some kind of CIA building. They made it 'fit in' by covering the building with fake windows, although I did see them doing some renovations on it so I'm not sure if that's still the case.

All black one? now an all white one? didn't belong to them.

I don't know if it had a color, really, as the whole building was covered in fake windows so there wasn't much color showing. It could be all white now, I'd have to look next time I go by.

I assume you're talking about the building that was at the SE corner of 7100 and 286, off Sunrise.

Where I come from "spooks" has two meanings, and neither makes sense here as far as I can tell.

It can be a slang term for "spies", and sometimes by extension, anyone who works for a secretive government organization like the CIA or NSA.

Yes. There's even a TV show named "Spooks", though they renamed it for the US/Canadian audience. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0160904

Why does Quartz allow for their menu bar to resize for any window size but prevent the article pane from doing the same thing? I get large grey space on the right side of any story that I read on a large-enough monitor.

Honestly, their UI is so terrible I have decided not to even click on any more of their links. Its like they designed it to be user unfriendly.

I'm glad it's not just me.

I read a proposal today for bp;dr (behind paywall, didn't read). Can we have an acronym for "fucked up zoom on my ipad"/"doesnt even render with ghostery enabled"/"stupid marketing modals render it unviewable"/etc?

ui;dr

Unusable interface, didn't read. It's also fairly self explanatory!

At least you can read it. On a windows phone it just redirects to the start page and there is no link to the article.

Utter crock.

Not to be "relevant xkcd guy" but here's the relevant xkcd for that:

http://xkcd.com/869/

Ha so true! Thanks for posting.

It is better than Wired's mobile format...where they let you use the full screen to scroll, but as soon as you stop scrolling and start reading, they pop up their logo bar in front of the text you are reading.

Their article pane resizes to an extent, but I assume it stops expanding after a certain size because they don't want to exceed an optimal width for readability [1].

Without being able to see it on your monitor, can't tell for sure.

[1]: http://www.pearsonified.com/2011/12/golden-ratio-typography....

Right, but couldn't they expand the pane but leave the text at the same ratio? The way it is now, the right-hand scrollbar leaves the right side of the window[1], which is kind of weird. Adding whitespace on the sides might be a better way to achieve the same goal.

[1]: http://i.imgur.com/doaiMyc.jpg

Reply on news.ycombinator.com