When these "scientists" can get lions to stop eating gazelles, I'll stop eating cows, chickens, and fish.
That being said, I am concerned about how animals are treated during their lifetime.
That being said, I am concerned about how animals are treated during their lifetime.
I don't understand. Ultimately it ends up in someone's stomach and provides sustenance. How is it any different?
Also, this is a ridiculous justification for meat eating, since lions cannot reason about morality.
If both lions and gazelles have conscious awareness, and we do not condemn the lion for eating a fellow conscious awareness holder, then why should we hold ourselves to higher standards? If we believe that the taking of any conscious life is wrong, then we should see that the lion is wrong, and punish him. Lion prison anyone?
I'm unclear what level of moral justification is needed. I want to survive. There are weaker animals for me to eat. My gut can process their meat. My teeth can rip their flesh.
I guess I haven't transcended nature and evolution the way vegetarians have.
These two statements do not have a direct and necessary relationship, since "eating weaker animals" is not required for our survival or health. Also, you must be a nihilist if you think your actions do not require moral justification. Ethical vegetarians have not and do not claim to have "transcended" anything, and are simply following the dictates of their consciences. Most people, I think, believe that it is wrong to cause unprovoked suffering in another being (who can suffer); ethical vegetarians are just a subset of this group who are more consistent in keeping their actions true to this moral axiom.
That's why we domesticated our prey, which is what everyone seems to be complaining about now.