It's amazing how practical some of the things that Aaron worked on are.
Is there any data that sending template emails works? It seems like its too easy to write off as people investing minimal effort, and not sending a unique message.
I honestly don't know,, but this does not feel 'effective' to me.
There's some irony there.
Think of it like a poll. Would you make the claim that politicians are willing to write off people who respond to polls just because they all answer the same question or the question isn't somehow the "right" one? Probably not.
Of course, it's not a poll because people self-select. But even still, if the report to the representative says "this week, we had 37 letters about gun control and 43,742 about surveillance", well, it's clear what the politician wants to say that he or she is doing something about when he or she next sees a reporter.
If the most you can be bothered with is typing in your name and hitting send, why would any Congress member even believe you'll bother to vote in the next election? Or donate? Or convince other people to vote for their opponent?
> It's amazing how practical some of the things that Aaron worked on are.
I predict such large-spectrum email delivery will:
- either arrive to the designated inbox, and get ignored
- or get stopped by a spam filter
If you want something to happen, at least write a personalized email, or better, call. It's more difficult to answer calls with a form letter.
I'm Paddy Mullen, and instead of donating $50 to your campaign, I donated it to the EFF. I did this because you ignore the rights of the citizens and haven't held the NSA responsible for the infringements on privacy.
Let the staffers get 100s - 1000s of calls that way.