So, what's new news in the CNET story?

The order has to be for account information or an intercept directed at a specific foreign person, and "you can't say everyone in Pakistan who searched for 'X'... It still has to be particularized."

This seems to contradict the NYT's claim http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/08/technology/tech-companies-... that

FISA orders can range from inquiries about specific people to a broad sweep for intelligence, like logs of certain search terms, lawyers who work with the orders said.

. Maybe it's specifically there to contradict the NYT claim.