60% of Twitter Users Quit Within the First Month
mashable.com
mashable.com
Most people don't really need or even understand Twitter's functionality. Those who do are getting it from Facebook. But the best part is that the numbers actually reflect this. 6 million users in 3 years of constant hype is not a high number. (Just to put it in perspective: I once contracted for a company that produced a shopping toolbar. Nothing viral, no PR to speak of, nice but not amazing functionality. 3 million downloads in a year.)
Any journalist could have deducted as much just looking at the user count. A slightly more serious one might actually use it for a while, and see how many of her followers are "SEO marketers", brands and other spammers. And yet the puff pieces continue. Personally, I think the best value we're getting from Twitter is in reminding us how incredibly poor, shiny object driven our media is, from Oprah all the way to Maureen Dowd.
I also think it's disingenuous to suggest that people don't understand Twitter's functionality when the point you're actually trying to make is that you can't see why anyone would want it. But if you make that point, you have to deal with people coming back at you talking about talking to their customers on Twitter, promoting niche products on Twitter, arranging ad-hoc meetups when traveling on Twitter, getting direct feedback from their fans on Twitter, and it's much easier to pretend like 140 character broadcast messages are somehow tricky.
I also think it's disingenuous to suggest that Twitter's N x 1MM users are the product of 3 years of constant hype, when 1.5-2 years of that hype was confined to the Web 2.0 trade echo chamber. CNN hasn't been hyping Twitter for 3 years.
In any case, my problem is not with Twitter. I see it as a neat niche app - maybe you're right and it will be a huge app. Nobody can really know at this point.
My disappointment is with its coverage. If the NY Times and CNN are this easily excited over a 6 million user website, what's their advantage over, say, Scoble? Are we rebooting the Web again? Watching them cover Twitter feels like watching middle aged parents trying to dress and act like their teenage children.
Are twitter adding any features? Seems like they will need to soon.
With that said, I can see a decent amount of people dropping Twitter soon after trying it. Twitter’s usefulness isn’t immediately apparent which gives them a chicken-and-egg problem. In order to see why Twitter works for some people you have to be active on it and have a group of friends who are also active on it. But in order to get that you have to see why it’s useful.
For the "keep up with what friends are doing" use case, there's no comparison.
Either twitter will need to adapt - and fast, or I suspect they'll die.
What sort of use case do you mean?
IMHO facebook wins when it comes to updating your friends, general chit chat with your close contacts.
The use case twitter is good for and facebook isn't yet afaik is 1 'celeb' updating thousands of followers.
Maybe all your friends on Facebook are really interesting. Most of us have some old classmate or relative who is a good person but constantly posts inane stuff to Facebook. My Facebook news feed is maybe 30% as interesting as Twitter's. I constantly unfollow boring people on Twitter and replace them by more interesting ones. You can't do that on Facebook.
XXXXX has been hidden from your News Feed.
In the future, you won't see posts from XXXXXwhereas I user twitter everyday.
Admittedly, this is more about micro-blogging rather than keeping up with friends. Twitter can serve both purposes.
One thing I like about the Facebook feed is that I can narrow it down to just Links/Videos, which improves the quality of the content somewhat. What I would really want to do is narrow it down to actual profile updates - status updates. Important stuff such as contact info changes gets lost in the stream of "having coffee," "traffic is bad today" style status updates.
Most of the people I know who joined Twitter followed this pattern:
1) create an account, "give Twitter a try"
2) Forget about it for a couple of months
3) Get back to it under renewed pressure, start using it properly, and stay
So the 1-month retention rate may well be irrelevant. What's the 3-6 months retention rate?
It's probably testable -- in fact, it sounds like an opportunity to pick up the Twitter API, which I've been meaning to do for some time now.
However, I wouldn't be suprised if Twitter doesn't have a good retention rate. Especially if you don't go into it with friends, starting out on Twitter is a little hard, and takes time to build up your stream of information and relationships with other people.
Me and a few of my friends in the UK .net development world are on there but we go days between tweets because that's what everyone else is doing. There's no conversation for me at the moment. At this point I'm just sitting on my user account and waiting for the network to become worth being a part of.
on the other hand, having to set up additional software just to make one's twitter stream sensical, is a large barrier to entry. i bet more people get turned away than take the next step.
She did a terrible job using / teaching her audience about it, and all the moms at home give it a shot, don't get any value out of it, and quit.
Not to single out just Oprah, celebrities in general have done a great job decreasing the value.
So I deleted my account and now use specialized searches through the API to just show me what my close friends who use twitter are up to.
I don't buy that.
If anything the uptake I see in Twitter is nearly ALL people nerds would describe as "not tech-savvy." The nerds I know are all haughty and dismissive of Twitter. Most of the people I know on Twitter do not work in the tech industry, nor are they programmers or any other type of self-described "tech savvy" person.
At this point in history I'm not sure if it still makes sense to brand anyone as not tech-savvy enough to use something on the internet. Everyone in the developed world uses the internet all the time. My grandma has used email for 15 years. My mom has an iPhone and is in charge of curating her work's wiki. My 16 year old cheerleader cousin is on FB, MySpace, five IM networks, sends 4000 text messages a month, etc. The us vs. the not-tech-savvy attitude is a bit archaic at this point.