Thanks, "career intelligence community worker" for showing how it's done.
Thanks, "career intelligence community worker" for showing how it's done.
I'm of the view that life is too short to worry about whether the FBI is reading my emails
I sure as hell hope he didn't leak anything to the BBC as they have abandoned the notion of protecting their sources!
What difference would it make if he leaked it to the internet at-large?
Any whistle blower who has made the moral choice to make certain information public has a choice around whether to take responsible steps to ensure that the information is released to the public as they intended.
Releasing it only to the media companies is an odd decision, if you want to be sure the information will be made freely available.
Because journalists are known to sit on earth-shattering news. Journalists have the greatest incentives for making the information freely available.
If all information were truly meant to be free we wouldn't demand corporations employ strict privacy policies...
randall's comment makes more sense regarding the Guardian and the Post would be more responsible to only publish information that wouldn't risk lives although I don't think it's right to push the responsibility on to them.
The media reports on the information they obtain, but they don't always release the raw information as it was received.